Processing Printed Words in Literary Arabic and Spoken Arabic: An fNIRS Study — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Processing Printed Words in Literary Arabic and Spoken Arabic: An fNIRS Study
The Unit for the Study of Arabic Language, Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
,
The Unit for the Study of Arabic Language, Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
,
Department of Learning Disabilities, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
1 The Unit for the Study of Arabic Language, Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
2 The Unit for the Study of Arabic Language, Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
3 Department of Learning Disabilities, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Diglossia refers to a socio-linguistic situation in which two varieties of the same language are used for distinct purposes in everyday life. In Arabic, Spoken Arabic (SA) is the firstly acquired dialect used for oral and informal communication in everyday conversations. Literary Arabic (LA), acquired later in life through formal education, is used for reading and writing and by literate individuals in formal settings such as the media and official speeches. Because of the linguistic distance between the two Arabic varieties, some authors have suggested that SA and LA might cognitively function as first (L1) and second language (L2). Up to now, very few studies using imaging techniques had addressed the question of the neural basis of diglossia in Arabic native speakers. In this study, we sought to test whether or not the visual processing of high (LA-HF), low frequency LA words (LA-LF), and SA-HF words induce detectable differences in the brain responses collected by functional Near-Infra Red Spectroscopy (fNIRS). For this aim, a semantic categorization task, previously assessed in fMRI studies. Based on previous observations, it was predicted that LA words, will be processed faster and more accurately than SA ones. Furthermore, it was predicted that a modulation of the responses (by language conditions) will be found in the left frontal areas. At the behavioral level, the analysis of RTs revealed an effect of language variety in individual response variance and accuracy showed a clear advantage for LA-HF words over LA-LF and SA-HF ones. The analysis of oxygenation level revealed a significant response modulation in frontal and posterior areas by language variety. These results are discussed in the context of diglossia and the advantages/limitations of this new imaging methodology and its use to assess language processing in the brain.
KeywordsDiglossiaVisual Word ProcessingSemantic Categorization TaskSpoken ArabicLiterary ArabicWord Frequency
Abdelhadi, S. et al. (2011). Perceptual Load in the Reading of Arabic: Effects of Orthographic Visual Complexity on Detection. Writing Systems Research, 3, 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr014
Abou-Ghazaleh, A. et al. (2018). Lexical Competition between Spoken and Literary Arabic: A New Look into the Neural Basis of Diglossia Using fMRI. Neuroscience, 393, 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.09.045
Abou-Ghazaleh, A. et al. (2020). Language Control in Diglossic and Bilingual Contexts: An Event-Related fMRI Study Using Picture Naming Tasks. Brain Topography, 33, 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-019-00735-7
Abu-Rabia, S. (2000). Effects of Exposure to Literary Arabic on Reading Comprehension in a Diglossic Situation. Reading and Writing, 13, 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008133701024
Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). The Role of Vowels in Reading Semitic Scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 14, 39-59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008147606320
Ahmed, M. K.-A. (2012). Diglossia in Auditory Lexical Decision: An Event-Related Potential Study. Haifa: University of Haifa, Faculty of Education, Department of Learning Disabilities.
Andria, S. (2016). Diglossia in Arabic: Event-Related Potentials during a Visual Lexical Decision Task. Haifa: University of Haifa, Faculty of Education, Department of Learning Disabilities.
Arimitsu, T. et al. (2011). Functional Hemispheric Specialization in Processing Phonemic and Prosodic Auditory Changes in Neonates. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00202
Asadi, I. A. et al. (2017). How Simple Is Reading in Arabic? A Cross-Sectional Investigation of Reading Comprehension from First to Sixth Grade. Journal of Research in Reading, 40, S1-S22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12093
Ayari, S. (1996). Diglossia and Illiteracy in the Arab World. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 9, 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908319609525233
Bentin, S., & Ibrahim, R. (1996). New Evidence for Phonological Processing during Visual Word Recognition: The Case of Arabic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.2.309
Binder, J. R. et al. (2003). Neural Correlates of Lexical Access during Visual Word Recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 372-393. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903321593108
Chee, M. W. et al. (2001). Relative Language Proficiency Modulates BOLD Signal Change When Bilinguals Perform Semantic Judgments. Neuroimage, 13, 1155-1163. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0781
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The Unique Role of the Visual Word Form Area in Reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 254-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003
Emmorey, K. et al. (2016). Psycholinguistic, Cognitive, and Neural Implications of Bimodal Bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000085
Eviatar, Z. et al. (2019). Speed of Reading Texts in Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 32, 537-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9877-y
Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2000). Bilingual Is as Bilingual Does: Metalinguistic Abilities of Arabic-Speaking Children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 451-471. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400004021
Fabbro, F. (2001). The Bilingual Brain: Cerebral Representation of Languages. Brain and Language, 79, 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2481
Feitelson, D. et al. (1993). Effects of Listening to Story Reading on Aspects of Literacy Acquisition in a Diglossic Situation. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/747817
Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15, 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702
Ferrari, M., & Quaresima, V. (2012). A Brief Review on the History of Human Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Development and Fields of Application. Neuroimage, 63, 921-935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.049
Fiebach, C. J. et al. (2002). fMRI Evidence for Dual Routes to the Mental Lexicon in Visual Word Recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317205285
Fisch, B. J. (1991). Spehlmann’s EEG Primer. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Limited.
Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1986). Focal Physiological Uncoupling of Cerebral Blood Flow and Oxidative Metabolism during Somatosensory Stimulation in Human Subjects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 83, 1140-1144. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.4.1140
Gervain, J. et al. (2011). Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Report from the McDonnell Infant Methodology Consortium. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 22-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2010.07.004
Horovitz, S. G., & Gore, J. C. (2004). Simultaneous Event-Related Potential and Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Studies of Semantic Processing. Human Brain Mapping, 22, 110-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20018
Hoshi, Y., & Michael, F. (2005). Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: Potential and Limitations in Neuroimaging Studies. International Review of Neurobiology, 66, 237-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(05)66008-4
Hull, R., & Vaid, J. (2006). Laterality and Language Experience. Laterality, 11, 436-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500600691162
Ibrahim, R. (2009). The Cognitive Basis of Diglossia in Arabic: Evidence from a Repetition Priming Study within and between Languages. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2, 93. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S5138
Ibrahim, R. et al. (2002). The Characteristics of Arabic Orthography Slow Its Processing. Neuropsychology, 16, 322. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.16.3.322
Ibrahim, R., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). Is Literary Arabic a Second Language for Native Arab Speakers? Evidence from Semantic Priming Study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-3631-8
Ibrahim, R., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). Is Literary Arabic a Second Language for Native Arab Speakers? Evidence from Semantic Priming Study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-3631-8
Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar, Z. (2009). Language Status and Hemispheric Involvement in Reading: Evidence from Trilingual Arabic Speakers Tested in Arabic, Hebrew, and English. Neuropsychology, 23, 240.
Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar, Z. (2012). The Contribution of the Two Hemispheres to Lexical Decision in Different Languages. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-3
Jasinska, K. K., & Petitto, L.-A. (2013). How Age of Bilingual Exposure Can Change the Neural Systems for Language in the Developing Brain: A Functional near Infrared Spectroscopy Investigation of Syntactic Processing in Monolingual and Bilingual Children. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2013.06.005
Jasińska, K., & Petitto, L. (2014). Development of Neural Systems for Reading in the Monolingual and Bilingual Brain: New Insights from Functional near Infrared Spectroscopy Neuroimaging. Developmental Neuropsychology, 39, 421-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2014.939180
Joubert, S. et al. (2004). Neural Correlates of Lexical and Sublexical Processes in Reading. Brain and Language, 89, 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00403-6
Kahlaoui, K. et al. (2007). Semantic Processing of Words in the Aging Brain: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) Study. Brain and Language, 1, 144-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.07.087
Kashti, O. (2013). Israeli Student Achievement Does Not Leave much Room for Optimism. Ha’aretz, December 3.
Keatley, C. W. et al. (1994). Asymmetrical Cross-Language Priming Effects. Memory & Cognition, 22, 70-84. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202763
Khamis-Dakwar, R., & Froud, K. (2007). Lexical Processing in Two Language Varieties. Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics. The Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Vol. 20, Kalamazoo, 112-141.
Khateb, A., & Ibrahim, R. (2020). About the Neural Basis of Arabic Diglossia: Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Analysis of Word Processing in Spoken and Literary Arabic. In Handbook of Literacy in Diglossia and Dialectal Contexts: Psycholinguistic and Educational Perspectives (201-214). Berlin: Springer.
Kim, K. H. et al. (1997). Distinct Cortical Areas Associated with Native and Second Languages. Nature, 388, 171-174. https://doi.org/10.1038/40623
Kronbichler, M. et al. (2004). The Visual Word Form Area and the Frequency with Which Words Are Encountered: Evidence from a Parametric fMRI Study. Neuroimage, 21, 946-953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.021
Levin, I. et al. (2008). Early Literacy in Arabic: An Intervention Study among Israeli Palestinian Kindergartners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 413-436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408080193
Ludyga, S. et al. (2019). A Combined EEG-fNIRS Study Investigating Mechanisms Underlying the Association between Aerobic Fitness and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults. Neuroscience, 419, 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.08.045
Mechelli, A. et al. (2003). Neuroimaging Studies of Word and Pseudoword Reading: Consistencies, Inconsistencies, and Limitations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903321208196
Miller, D. et al. (2018). Bilingual Cognition and Language: The State of the Science across Its Subfields. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Minagawa-Kawai, Y. et al. (2008). Optical Imaging of Infants’ Neurocognitive Development: Recent Advances and Perspectives. Developmental Neurobiology, 68, 712-728. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20618
Nevat, M. et al. (2014). When First Language Is Not First: An Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of the Neural Basis of Diglossia in Arabic. European Journal of Neuroscience, 40, 3387-3395. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12673
Oi, M. et al. (2010). Semantic Judgment of Chinese-Japanese Bilinguals: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study. Neuroreport, 21, 127-131. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e328334f235
Perani, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2005). The Neural Basis of First and Second Language Processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 202-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.007
Plichta, M. M. et al. (2011). Auditory Cortex Activation Is Modulated by Emotion: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study. Neuroimage, 55, 1200-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.011
Quaresima, V. et al. (2002). Lateral Frontal Cortex Oxygenation Changes during Translation and Language Switching Revealed by Non-Invasive Near-Infrared Multi-Point Measurements. Brain Research Bulletin, 59, 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-9230(02)00871-7
Quaresima, V. et al. (2012). A Brief Review on the Use of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) for Language Imaging Studies in Human Newborns and Adults. Brain and Language, 121, 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.03.009
Safi, D. et al. (2012). Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for the Assessment of Overt Reading. Brain and Behavior, 2, 825-837. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.100
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic Distance and Initial Reading Acquisition: The Case of Arabic Diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 431-451. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000225
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The Impact of Phonemic and Lexical Distance on the Phonological Analysis of Words and Pseudowords in a Diglossic Context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 495-512. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001249
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of Reading Fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and Orthographic Factors. Reading and Writing, 18, 559-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3180-4
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic Constraints on Children’s Ability to Isolate Phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 607-625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070336
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2018). MAWRID: A Model of Arabic Word Reading in Development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51, 454-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417720460
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2020). A Psycholinguistic-Developmental Perspective on the Role of Diglossia in Reading: Issues, Methods, and Findings in Arabic as a Testcase. In Handbook of Literacy in Diglossia and Dialectal Contexts: Psycholinguistic and Educational Perspectives (76-98). Berlin: Springer.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. et al. (2011). The Linguistic Affiliation Constraint and Phoneme Recognition in Diglossic Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 38, 297-315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909990365
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological Awareness, Phonological Awareness, and Reading in English-Arabic Bilingual Children. Reading and Writing, 21, 481-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Joshi, R. M. (2014). Handbook of Arabic Literacy: Insights and Perspectives. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8545-7
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Schiff, R. (2016). The Impact of Diglossia on Voweled and Unvoweled Word Reading in Arabic: A Developmental Study from Childhood to Adolescence. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1180526
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Spolsky, B. (2014). Acquiring Literacy in a Diglossic Context: Problems and Prospects. In Handbook of Arabic Literacy (pp. 225-240). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8545-7_10
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Taha, H. (2017). The Role of Morphological and Phonological Awareness in the Early Development of Word Spelling and Reading in Typically Developing and Disabled Arabic Readers. Dyslexia, 23, 345-371. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1572
Schiff, R., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2018). Development and Relationships between Phonological Awareness, Morphological Awareness and Word Reading in Spoken and Standard Arabic. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00356
Seghier, M. L. et al. (2004). Variability of fMRI Activation during a Phonological and Semantic Language Task in Healthy Subjects. Human Brain Mapping, 23, 140-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20053
Sela, I. et al. (2012). A Working Memory Deficit among Dyslexic Readers with No Phonological Impairment as Measured Using the N-Back Task: An fNIR Study. PLoS ONE, 7, e46527. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046527
Strangman, G. et al. (2002). A Quantitative Comparison of Simultaneous Bold fMRI and NIRS Recordings during Functional Brain Activation. Neuroimage, 17, 719-731. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1227
Sugiura, L. et al. (2011). Sound to Language: Different Cortical Processing for First and Second Languages in Elementary School Children as Revealed by a Large-Scale Study Using fNIRS. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 2374-2393. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr023
Taha, H. et al. (2013). How Does Arabic Orthographic Connectivity Modulate Brain Activity during Visual Word Recognition: An ERP Study. Brain Topography, 26, 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-012-0241-2
Taha, H., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2017). Morphology and Spelling in Arabic: Development and Interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9425-3
Telkemeyer, S. et al. (2009). Sensitivity of Newborn Auditory Cortex to the Temporal Structure of Sounds. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 14726-14733. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1246-09.2009
Vanderwert, R. E., & Nelson, C. A. (2014). The Use of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in the Study of Typical and Atypical Development. Neuroimage, 85, 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.009
Vannasing, P. et al. (2016). Distinct Hemispheric Specializations for Native and Non-Native Languages in One-Day-Old Newborns Identified by fNIRS. Neuropsychologia, 84, 63-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.038
Zughoul, M. R. (1980). Diglossia in Arabic: Investigating Solutions. Anthropological Linguistics, 22, 201-217.