Semantic Mutuality in Concepts and Reflection of National Cultural Specificity in Their Transformation Based on Chingiz Aitmatov’s Works
- 1 Department of Linguistics, Academic Consortium International University of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
- 2 Department of Science, Ministry of Education and Science of the Kyrgyz Republic, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
- 3 Department of Linguistics, Academic Consortium International University of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
- 4 Department of Philology, Academic Consortium International University of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
- 5 Institute of Foreign Languages, St. Petersburg, Russia
- 6 Science and Research Department, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
Abstract
In this article authors are analyzing questions “What is a person? Where and how was man created? How can a human become a real person?” Questions like these cannot be left unanswered by all humanity. Such philosophical ideas have been relevant since ancient times and are still relevant today. It is impossible to imagine the universe without humankind, nor can a human ask for life without the universe and the environment around it. These two concepts are inseparably linked together, as for the concept of “human”, it is known all over the world, because the mythological statement “Adam and Eve” is well known in connection with the emergence of humanity on earth. The social significance and importance in this study based on the topic relevance concepts “man” and “the universe”, and their relationship, which are the main components of life on the earth. Moreover, today modern challenges pose big problems for society in the world, and the main task is to remain as human and preserve peace on the earth. The main research purpose is to analyze etymological attributes and structure of the concept “Man”; origin and meanings with characteristics in various characteristics properties belonging to humankind in general.
- Akmataliev, A. (2018). Ch. Aitmatov: The Universe and Man. Ch. Aitmatov’s 10 Volume Collection, V. 10 (364 p.). Uluu Toolor.
- Arstanbekova, Z. A. (2014). The Transition from the Genre of the Story to the Novel in the Work of Ch. Aitmatov (pp. 55-66). Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia.
- Buijs, V. L., Jeronimus, B. F., Lodder, G. M. A., Steverink, N., & de Jonge, P. (2021). Social Needs and Happiness: A Life Course Perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22, 1953-1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00287-9
- Chernobrovkina, E. P. (2011). Content Analysis in Linguistic Research (pp. 125-129). Buryat State University.
- Chonmurunova, N. Z. (2016). Representation of the Concepts of Good and Evil in the Works of Ch. T. Aitmatov (on the Material of the Novel “Scum”). Privolzhsky Scientific Bulletin, 3, 100-104.
- Darbanov, M. E. (2016). Cognitive Linguistics Content of Concept “Adam” (294 p.). Bishkek.
- Demyankov, V. Z. (2001). Concept and Concept in Fiction and Scientific Language. Questions of Philology, 1, 35-47.
- Dzyuba, E. V. (2011). The Concept of “Mind” in Russian Linguoculture: Monograph (224 p.). Ural State Pedagogocal University.
- Esemuratov, A. E. (2017). On the Question of Etymology and Etymological Analysis. Academy, 3, 51-56.
- Golovanova, E. I. (2011). An Introduction to Cognitive Terminology (224 p.). Science.
- Herrington, L. (2013). Globalization and Religion in Historical Perspective: A Paradoxical Relationship. Religions, 4, 145-165. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel4010145
- Jackendoff, R. (1989). What is a Concept, That a Person May Grasp It? Mind & Language, 4, 68-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1989.tb00243.x
- Jusupov, M., & Ethem, M. (2017). Holy Quran: Introduction to the Kyrgyz Translation of the Meaning of the English Translation and Research at the Scientific Level. Journal of Tafsir Studies, 1, 132-157.
- Karabulatova, I. S., Sayfulina, F. S., Zamalieva, L. F., & Niyazova, G. M. (2015). Chingiz Aitmatov’s Creative Works in the National Literature as a Reflection of a New Ethnic Mythology of the Soviet Period. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 155. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s2p155
- Karasik, V. I. (2000). On the Types of Discourse. Language Personality: Institutional and Personal Discourse (pp. 5-20). Collection of Scientific Works, Change.