Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
About Transformation Formulas of the Most Ancient Roots in Eurasian Languages
Department of Russian and Comparative Linguistics, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
Department of Phonetics and Grammar of English, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
Department of American Studies and Translation, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
Department of American Studies and Translation, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
Department of Theory and Methodology of Languages and Literature in Primary Education, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
Department of Psychology, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
Department of Theory and Practice of Translation in Chinese Language, Kyrgyz National University named after J. Balasagyn, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
Department of Theory and Practice of Translation in Chinese Language, Kyrgyz National University named after J. Balasagyn, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
Department of Russian and Eurasian Integration, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
Department of Chinese Culture, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
Science and Research Department, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 1 Department of Russian and Comparative Linguistics, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 2 Department of Phonetics and Grammar of English, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 3 Department of American Studies and Translation, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 4 Department of American Studies and Translation, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 5 Department of Theory and Methodology of Languages and Literature in Primary Education, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 6 Department of Psychology, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 7 Department of Theory and Practice of Translation in Chinese Language, Kyrgyz National University named after J. Balasagyn, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
- 8 Department of Theory and Practice of Translation in Chinese Language, Kyrgyz National University named after J. Balasagyn, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
- 9 Department of Russian and Eurasian Integration, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 10 Department of Chinese Culture, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 11 Science and Research Department, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
Open Journal of Modern Linguistics·Volume 11 (2021)·Pages 907–918·Published 23 November 2021·DOI10.4236/ojml.2021.116070
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
The article compares the root morphemes of common lexemes of a number of languages of Eurasia, which have identical origins. Facts of the Turkic languages are used as the main material. Research on transformation formulas of Eurasian languages ancient roots is made by reconstruction, comparative historical, comparative typological and transform modeling methods. Etymological analysis of facts has been carried out from the standpoint of altaistics and nostratics. It shows that the Chinese language, under the influence of the open syllable rule, lost its final consonants, which were preserved in the Altai and other languages of Eurasia.
KeywordsNostraticsAltaisticsTurkic LanguagesChinese (Hanyu)Economy of Articulation EffortsReconstruction of the Most Ancient Root
- Amiraliev, S. M., Saparbayeva, A. A., & Kayimova, F. M. (2020). Reflexes of the Most Ancient Root Deng “Equal” in the Languages of Eurasia. The World of Science, Culture and Education, 80, 380-383.
- Bogacheva, M. V. (2009). Possibilities of the Reconstruction Method in Historical and Lexicological Research 1. Perm University Bulletin. Russian and Foreign Philology, 3, 42-51.
- Cheremisina, T. I. (2017). Features of the Dynamics of Modern English-Chinese Language Contact. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 7, 114-132.
- Cheremisina, T. I. (2019). Chinese Borrowings in Modern English as an Element of Cultural and Linguistic Contacts. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 6, 91-107.
- Dolgopolskiy, A. B. (1964). Hypothesis of the Oldest Kinship of Eurasian Language Families from a Probabilistic Point of View. Problems of linguistics, 2, 53-63.
- Dolgopolskiy, A. B. (1967). In Search of Distant Kinship. Russian Speech, 6, 95-112.
- Fasmer, M. (1986). Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language in 4 Volumes. Volume I (A-D). Moscow Progress, 573 p.
- Illich-Svitych, V. M. (1976). Experience in Comparing Nostratic Languages (Semitohamitic, Kartvelian, Indo-European, Uralic, Altaic, and Dravidian): Comparative Dictionary. Nauka, 483 p.
- Imin, C., Ien, Y., & Zhongbao, S. (2001). Chinese-Russian Dictionary. Veche, 1418 p.
- Kozhaeva, O. S. (2008). Comparative Typological Studies at the Present Stage of the Development of Linguistics. Bulletin of the South Ural State University Series: Linguistics, 16, 3-6.
- Levina, O. V. (2012). Big Chinese-Russian and Russian-Chinese Dictionary. Veche, 960 p.
- Levitskaya, L. S., Dybo, A. V., Rassadin, V. I., & Blagova, G. F. (1997). Etymological Dictionary of the Turkic Languages: Common Turkic and Inter Turkic Lexical Bases on the Letters “K”. Languages of Russian Culture, 362 p.
- Morgacheva, E. N. (2016). The Comparative Historical Method: An Overview of Approaches to Classification in the Social Sciences. RGGU Bulletin. Series: Psychology. Pedagogy. Education, 2, 102-114.
- Napolskikh, V. V. (2018). On the Problems of Studying the Ancient Prehistory of Northern Eurasia (Nostratic Macrofamily of Languages). Ethnography, 1, 119-142. https://doi.org/10.31250/2618-8600-2018-1-119-142