A Mixed-Method Study of EFL Writers’ Monitoring and Revising Processes in Completing an Integrated Writing Task
- 1 School of Applied Foreign Languages, Zhejiang International Studies University, Hangzhou, China
- 2 School of Marxism, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
This study investigated how English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writers monitored the quality of their writings, and how they made revisions accordingly while completing a reading-to-write task. Two independent studies were conducted in this research study. In Study I, 16 participants completed a reading-to-write task, during which their eye movements were tracked. These eye traces then formed the stimuli for a stimulated recall session to elicit cognitive processes. In Study II, a reading-to-write process questionnaire was administered to another 172 participants after they completed the same task. Results showed that there is ample evidence of the use of monitoring and revising processes, most of which occurred during the writing and after writing the first draft. The participants conducted monitoring and revising activities at both a basic level, when they dealt mainly with textual features such as spelling, word use and sentence structure, and at a more advanced level, when they monitored issues such as relevance to the task, development of arguments and coherence and cohesion.
- Bosher, S. (1998). The Composing Processes of Three Southeast Asian Writers at the Post-Secondary Level: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 205-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90013-3
- Chan, S. H. C. (2011). Demonstrating the Cognitive Validity and Face Validity of PTE Academic Writing Items. Pearson External Research Notes. https://assets.ctfassets.net/yqwtwibiobs4/61AXVo5cbq7JyDrfII4okH/23d1842e26 72f67ee51bc85e1d1fb416/Demonstrating_cognitive_validity_and_face_validity_of_PTE_Academic_Writing_Items_-_Sathena_H._C._Chan.pdf
- Chan, S. H. C. (2013). Establishing the Validity of Reading-into-Writing Test Tasks for the UK Academic Context. Unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Bedford-shire.
- Field, J. (2004). Psycholinguistics: The Key Concepts. Routledge.
- Gebril, A., & Plakans, L. (2013). Toward a Transparent Construct of Reading-to-Write Tasks: The Interface between Discourse Features and Proficiency. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10, 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.642040
- Golparvar, S. E., & Khafi, A. (2021). The Role of L2 Writing Self-Efficacy in Integrated Writing Strategy Use and Performance. Assessing Writing, 47, Article ID: 100504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100504
- Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1996). Self-Regulation and Strategy Instruction for Students Who Find Writing and Learning Challenging. In C. M. Levy, & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications (pp. 347-360). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The Role of Self-Regulation and Transcription Skills in Writing and Writing Development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_2
- Harwood, N. (2009). An Interview-Based Study of the Functions of Citations in Academic Writing across Two Disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 497-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001
- Hinkel, E. (2006). Current Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 109-131. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264513
- Hirvela, A. (2004). Connecting Reading and Writing in Second Language Writing Instruction. The University of Michigan Press.
- MacArther, C. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2004). Insights from Instructional Research on Revision with Struggling Writers. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and Instructional Processes (pp. 125-137). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_8