Representational Development of Polysemous Words in Bilingual Mental Lexicon: Socio-Cognitive Perspectives
- 1 School of Applied Foreign Languages, Zhejiang International Studies University, Hangzhou, China
Abstract
When learning English, students often grapple with the meanings of ambiguous words. However, the acquisition of polysemous words by EFL learners remains underrepresented in the research literature. To address this imbalance, the present study intends to investigate the development of the mental representations of polysemous words in Chinese EFL learners. We first measured the students’ lexical knowledge of polysemous words via word association, whereby they were divided into two groups: the high proficiency group and the low proficiency group. Then a questionnaire was administered to the students to investigate their English metaphoric competence and vocabulary learning strategies. The results indicated that the students’ polysemy learning strategies and metaphoric competence could have modulated the representational development of polysemous words in light of the meaning extension mechanisms.
- Cai, L. Q. (2003). The Application of Metaphor Theories in Second Language Acquisition. Journal of Foreign Languages, No. 6, 38-45.
- Chen, Y. C., & Lai, H. L. (2015). Developing EFL Learners’ Metaphoric Competence through Cognitive-Oriented Methods. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53, 415-438. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0019
- Dong, Y. P., & Zhou, C. Q. (2003). A Study of Acquisition of Receptive and Productive Knowledge of Highly Familiar Polysemous Words. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 6, 49-52.
- Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical Representation and Development in a Second Language. Applied Linguistics, 21, 47-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.1.47
- Klepousniotou, E., & Baum, S. R. (2007). Disambiguating the Ambiguity Advantage Effect in Word Recognition: An Advantage for Polysemous but Not Homonymous Words. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.02.001
- Laufer, B., & Hadar, L. (1997). Assessing the Effectiveness of Monolingual, Bilingual and Bilingualized Dictionaries in the Comprehension and Production of New Words. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb01174.x
- Li, H. L. (2019). Exploring the Acquisition of English Ambiguous Words by Chinese EFL learners. China Social Sciences Press.
- Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Metaphoric Competence, Second Language Learning, and Communicative Language Ability. Applied Linguistics, 27, 268-294. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml004
- McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.113
- O’Reilly, D., & Marsden, E. (2021). Eliciting and Measuring L2 Metaphoric Competence: Three Decades on from Low (1988). Applied Linguistics, 42, 24-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz066
- Schmitt, N. (2002). Vocabulary Learning Strategies. In N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
- Shi, J. F., & Tang, B. (2018). An Investigation into the Knowledge of Metaphorical Senses in ESL Learners. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 3, 18-23.
- Wolter, B. (2001). Comparing the L1 and L2 Mental Lexicon: A Depth of Individual Word Knowledge Model. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 41-69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101001024