A Study on Critical Thinking Cultivation in Senior High School English Teaching Considering the Internet+ Background
- 1 School of Foreign Languages, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China
- 2 School of Foreign Languages, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China
Abstract
Undeniably, language education and thinking cultivation are intrinsically linked. Considering Internet+, English teaching aimed at senior high school students is inseparable from the Internet and online network tools. Hence, the cultivation and development of senior high school students’ critical thinking abilities is deeply affected by Internet+. Following critical questionnaires and teaching case analyses, this study investigates the timely instances reflective of the cultivation of students’ critical thinking. Specifically, it is focused on senior high school English classes and their relationship with “Internet+”. Moreover, it also advises on how to most effectively cultivate senior high school students’ critical thinking abilities, reaping the benefits of “Internet+”. According to vital research, a diverse range of critical thinking sub-skills is cultivated depending on the different types of high school English teaching methods applicable. The development of critical thinking sub-skills ranges from high to low: explanation > interpretation > analysis > inference > evaluation > self-regulation, respectively. Concurrently, the cultivation of critical thinking in high school English teaching methodology can be promoted based on the cooperation of educational institutions, teaching and research groups, teachers, and students.
- Brown, H. D. (2004). Some Practical Thoughts about Students’ Sensitive Critical Pedagogy. The Language Teacher, 28, 23-27．
- Chen, Z., Wang, Q., & Qian, X. (2019). Exploring the Concept of Thinking Capacity in the Key Competencies of English and the Ways for Developing Them. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 39, 91-98.
- Ennis, R. (1985). A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills. Educational Leadership, 43, 44-48.
- Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking : A Statement of Expert Consens us for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction (Executive Summary of “ The Delphi Report ” ). Academic Press.
- Li, L. (2018). Education Program for Digital China—Based on the “Internet Plus” Perspective. Journal of Northeast Normal University, 5, 190-194.
- Li, R. (2002). Foreign Language Teaching and Cultivation of Students’ Creative and Critical Thinking. Foreign Language Education, 5, 61-65.
- Li, S. (2015). English Language Teaching Reform and Innovation: Internet+ Education Discussion. Guangming Daily Publishing House.
- Lin, C. (2005). Cultivating Thinking Qualities Is the Breakthrough Point for Developing Intelligence. Journal of National Academy of Education Administration, 9, 21-26+32.
- Liu, D. (2018). Thinking Quality: A Key Competency in English Subject. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 38, 80-85.
- Luo, Q. (2001). The Construction, Training Model of Critical Thinking and Problems in Research and Training. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities, 3, 215-218.
- Ministry of Education (2018). English Curriculum Standards for Senior High School (2017 Edition). Beijing People’s Education Press.
- Ou, Y., Wang, P., & Hu, D. (2024). The Characteristics of Critical Thinking and Localized Cultivation Strategies. Teaching & Administration, No. 9, 7-11.
- Schrock, K. (1998). Evaluation of World Wide Web Sites: An Annotated Bibli ography. Eric Digest.
- Song, L., & Tian, L. (2017). New Paths of the Development of Students’ Key Competencies in the “Internet+” Area. China Educational Technology, 360, 78-82.
- Wang, J. (2016). A Study of College English Majors’ Critical Thinking Ability in Using Internet Resources. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, 171, 39-43.