Lingual and Cultural Features of the Semantics of Metrological Phraseological Units with the Component—Common Name Measure , Messen , Miara , M і ра on the Example of English, German, Polish and Ukrainian Languages
- 1 Department of Language Mediation, Institute of Linguistics, Ostroh Academy National University, Ostroh, Ukraine
- 2 Department of English Language and Literature, Institute of Linguistics, Ostroh Academy National University, Ostroh, Ukraine
- 3 Department of English Philology, Institute of Linguistics, Ostroh Academy National University, Ostroh, Ukraine
- 4 Department of Computer Linguistics, Institute of Linguistics, Ostroh Academy National University, Ostroh, Ukraine
- 5 Department of Computer Linguistics, Institute of Linguistics, Ostroh Academy National University, Ostroh, Ukraine
Abstract
The article is devoted to the description of systems of measure and measurements of English, German, Polish and Ukrainian languages. It goes about the history of measures, the origin and formation of units of measurement. It studies the synonymous and variant-synonymous relations that were presented in the nations of the studied languages. The article deals with the linguoculturo-logical semantic features of the phraseology with metrological components in English, German, Polish and Ukrainian. For the first time, phraseology with such a type of components in the four languages has been studied for distinguishing their linguistic, national and cultural peculiarities, and their semantic characteristics have been given. Phraseology with components—general names Eng . measure , Ger . Messe n / Maß , Pol . miara / miarka , Ukr . міра / мі рка and with descriptive names of measurement units, which denote approximate distance, length, water depth and thickness of the object, has been researched.
- (1998). The New Oxford Dictionary of English Text. Oxford University Press.
- (2002). Oxford Chambers Dictionary of Idioms: English-Ukrainian Semibilingual. Vseuvyto.
- (n.d.). Wielki słownik języka polskiego. https://www.wsjp.pl
- Ardelyan, O. (2009). Kul’turno-natsional’na konotatsiya anhliys’kykh frazeolohizmiv [Cultural and National Connotation of English Phraseological Units]. Naukovi Zapysky Ser « Filolohichni nauky » , 89, 270-274.
- Avksent’yev, L. (1987). Semantychna struktura frazeolohichnykh odynyts ’ suchasnoyi ukra - yins ’ koyi movy ta osoblyvosti yiyi formuvannya [Semantic Structure of Phraseological Units of the Modern Ukrainian Language and Peculiarities of Its Formation]. Movo - znavstvo , 1, 43-46.
- Bilodid, I. (1971-1989). Slovnyk ukrayins ’ koyi movy [Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language]. Nauk.
- Bondarenko, H. (2015). Spetsial ’ ni istorychni dystsypliny [Special Historical Disciplines]. Red.-vyd.
- Dobrovolskii, D. (1997). Idiome im mentalen Lexikon: Ziele und Methoden der kognitiv - basierten Phraseologieforschung . WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
- Hrinchenko, B. (1958-1959). Slovar ’ ukrayins ’ koyi movy [Dictionary of the Ukra inian Language]. Vydavnytstvo AN URSR.
- Hrinchenko, B. (1996). Slovar ’ ukraynskaho yazyka [Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language]. Leksykon.
- Ivanova, S. (2003). Lingvokul’turologicheskiy aspekt issledovaniya yazykovykh yedinits [Linguistic and Cultural Aspect of the Study of Language Units]. Master’s Thesis.
- Kotsiuk, L., Kostiuk, O., Kovalchuk, I., Polishchuk, V., & Bobkov, V. (2021). The Formation and Development of Women’s Secondary Education in Volyn in the 19th—The Beginning of the 20th Century. Journal of Education Culture and Society , 12, 227-240. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.2.227.240
- Linde, S. (1854). Słownik języka polskiego [Polish Dictionary]. Lwów.
- Mokiyenko,V. (1989). Slavyanskaya frazeologiya [Slavic Phraseology]. Moskva.
- Palamarchuk, L. (1993). Frazeolohichnyy slovnyk ukrayins ’ koyi movy [Phraseological Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language]. Nauk, dumka.
- Plyushch, M., Bevzenko, S., & Hrypas, N. (2006) Suchasna ukrayins ’ ka literaturna mova : Pidruchnyk [ Modern Ukrainian Literary Language : Textbook ]. Vyshcha Shkola.