This study examines collaborative social interaction in online synchronous group discussions among Iraqi undergraduate learners. The study has been conducted to address a critical gap in previous research, which often relies on quantitative metrics such as word count and overlooks the complexity and function of discourse as a learning medium that shapes collaboration. Using a qualitative explanatory instrumental case study research design, the study investigates how learners construct knowledge through their interactions, employing speech acts as the unit of analysis to glean insights into their learning processes. Data collected from synchronous group discussions on Google Meet were analysed using Atlas.ti software and discourse analysis as the approach. The study uncovers primary speech acts employed by learners that either facilitate or hinder active collaborative social interaction. Notably, the prevalence of inquiry as a significant speech act fosters exploration of diverse viewpoints and deepens understanding, challenging assumptions of limited information exchange in online learning environments. Participants demonstrate flexibility in shaping discussions to achieve mutual understanding. These findings hold significant pedagogical implications in the Iraqi context for learners and researchers. The study emphasizes the importance of some discourse practice in online synchronous group discussions to promote collaborative learning. The study contributes to scholarly understanding of online learning and advocates future research exploring collaboration and technology-enhanced learning environments.
Al Jaid, Z., & Ghazanfari, M. (2023). A Contrastive Analysis of Disagreement Speech Act Used by Native Speakers of English and Iraqi EFL Learners in Light of Politeness Strategies. Journal of Contemporary Language Research, 2, 139-148. https://doi.org/10.58803/jclr.v2i3.79
Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Barriers and Opportunities of E-Learning Implementation in Iraq: A Case of Public Universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17, 126-146. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2501
Aldulaimi, M. H., Kadhim, T. A., & Alfaras, M. S. (2018). Towards Smart Learning Environments in Iraqi Schools—Existing Infrastructure and Challenges. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9, 1939-1951.
Almendingen, K., Morseth, M. S., Gjølstad, E., Brevik, A., & Tørris, C. (2021). Student’s Experiences with Online Teaching Following COVID-19 Lockdown: A Mixed Methods Explorative Study. PLOS ONE, 16, e0250378. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250378
Ameen, N., Willis, R., Abdullah, M. N., & Shah, M. (2019). Towards the Successful Integration of E‐Learning Systems in Higher Education in Iraq: A Student Perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 1434-1446. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12651
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words . Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
Azmat, M., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Lack of Social Interaction in Online Classes during COVID-19. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science , 13, 185-196.
Camilleri, M. A., & Camilleri, A. C. (2022). Remote Learning via Video Conferencing Technologies: Implications for Research and Practice. Technology in Society, 68, Article ID: 101881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101881
Chen, G., Lo, C. K., & Hu, L. (2020). Sustaining Online Academic Discussions: Identifying the Characteristics of Messages That Receive Responses. Computers & Education, 156, Article ID: 103938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103938
Ciampi, C., Doyon-Lacasse, K., Priego, S., Chiang, M., & Liaw, M. (2018). Promoting Pre-and In-Service Teachers’ Co-Construction of Knowledge through an Intercultural Telecollaboration Project. Médiations et Médiatisations , 1, 34-49. https://doi.org/10.52358/mm.v1i1.56
Collazos, C. A., Fardoun, H., AlSekait, D., Pereira, C. S., & Moreira, F. (2021). Designing Online Platforms Supporting Emotions and Awareness. Electronics, 10, Article No. 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030251
Dawson, S. (2010). “Seeing” the Learning Community: An Exploration of the Development of a Resource for Monitoring Online Student Networking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 736-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00970.x
de Souza, J., Gillett, K., Salifu, Y., & Walshe, C. (2024). Changes in Participant Interactions. Using Focus Group Analysis Methodology to Explore the Impact on Participant Interactions of Face-to-Face versus Online Video Data Collection Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241241151
Derakhshan, A., & Shakki, F. (2024). Opportunities and Challenges of Implementing Online English Courses in Iranian Public and Private Schools. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 15, 17-31. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2023.44418.3111
Fathi, J., Ahmadnejad, M., & Yousofi, N. (2019). Effects of Blog-Mediated Writing Instruction on L2 Writing Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Regulation: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 10, 159-181.
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397-431. https://doi.org/10.2190/7mqv-x9uj-c7q3-nrag
Hasan, D. O., Aladdin, A. M., Amin, A. A. H., Rashid, T. A., Ali, Y. H., Al-Bahri, M. et al. (2023). Perspectives on the Impact of E-Learning Pre-and Post-Covid-19 Pandemic—The Case of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Sustainability, 15, Article No. 4400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054400
Herring, S. C., Das, A., & Penumarthy, S. (2005). CMC Act Taxo nomy . https://homes.luddy.indiana.edu/herring/cmc.acts.html
Howell, S. L., Williams, P. B., & Lindsay, N. K. (2003). Thirty-Two Trends Affecting Distance Education: An Informed Foundation for Strategic Planning . http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/howell63.html
Joksimović, S., Jovanovic, J., Kovanovic, V., Gasevic, D., Milikic, N., Zouaq, A. et al. (2019). Comprehensive Analysis of Discussion Forum Participation: From Speech Acts to Discussion Dynamics and Course Outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13, 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2019.2916808
Laurillard, D. (2009). The Pedagogical Challenges to Collaborative Technologies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9056-2
Lehtinen, A., Kostiainen, E., & Näykki, P. (2023). Co-Construction of Knowledge and Socioemotional Interaction in Pre-Service Teachers’ Video-Based Online Collaborative Learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 133, Article ID: 104299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104299
Loh, H. S., Martins van Jaarsveld, G., Mesutoglu, C., & Baars, M. (2024). Supporting Social Interactions to Improve MOOC Participants’ Learning Outcomes: A Literature Review. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article ID: 1345205. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1345205
Lucas, M., & Moreira, A. (2010). Knowledge Construction with Social Web Tools. In M. D. Lytras et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Reforming Education and Quality of Teaching, CCIS ’ 73 (pp. 278-284). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13166-0_40
Machtmes, K., & Asher, J. W. (2000). A Meta‐Analysis of the Effectiveness of Telecourses in Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 14, 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640009527043
Magfira, A., Weda, S., & Muhayyang, M. (2024). EFL Students’ Perceptions to the Benefits of Online Group Discussion. Celebes Journal of Language Studies, 4 , 141-156. https://doi.org/10.51629/cjls.v4i1.189
Maia, R. C., Hauber, G., Choucair, T., & Crepalde, N. J. (2021). What Kind of Disagreement Favors Reason-Giving? Analyzing Online Political Discussions across the Broader Public Sphere. Political Studies, 69, 108-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719894708
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A Systematic Review of Research on Online Teaching and Learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, Article ID: 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Application s in Education . Jossey-Bass.
Mohammed, M. A., & Al-Bakri, S. A. (2022). Iraqi EFL Preparatory School Teachers’ Preferences on Online Learning. Nasaq Journal , 35 , 651-683. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns4.12075
Mukherjee, A., & Liu, B. (2012). Mining Contentions from Discussions and Debates. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 841-849). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2339530.2339664
Ouyang, F., Wu, M., Zheng, L., Zhang, L., & Jiao, P. (2023). Integration of Artificial Intelligence Performance Prediction and Learning Analytics to Improve Student Learning in Online Engineering Course. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00372-4
Paulus, T. M. (2006). Challenge or Connect? Dialogue in Online Learning Environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 18, 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03032722
Phirangee, K., & Malec, A. (2020). Othering in Online Learning: An Examination of Social Presence, Identity, and Sense of Community. In P. R. Lowenthal, & V. P. Dennen (Eds.), Social Presence and Identity in Online Learning (pp. 24-36). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429294235-3
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 69-97). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language . Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1976). A Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Language in Society, 5, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500006837
Smith, J. B. (1994). Collective Intelligence in Computer-Based Colla boration . CRC Press.
Stahl, G. (2003). Meaning and Interpretation in Collaboration. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments (pp. 523-532). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_62
Tirthali, D., & Murai, Y. (2021). Facilitating Open Online Discussions: Speech Acts Inspiring and Hindering Deep Conversations. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 39, 280-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1991781
Traxler, J., Barcena, E., Andujar, A., Jalilifar, A., & Mashhadi, A. (2023). Introduction: Teaching Languages in Times of Social and Technological Change and Divide. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14, 3-6. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2023.18722
Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Context and Cognition: Knowledge Frames and Speech Act Comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics, 1, 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(77)90035-2
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in Society : The Development of Higher Psychol ogical Processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2020). Effects of Online Teaching Presence on Students’ Interactions and Collaborative Knowledge Construction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36, 370-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12408
Wertsch, J. V., Tulviste, P., & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A Sociocultural Approach to Agency. In E. A. Forman, et al . (Eds.), Contexts for Learning : Sociocultural Dynamics in Children ’ s Development (pp. 336-356). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195067156.003.0017
Ye, D., & Pennisi, S. (2022). Analysing Interactions in Online Discussions through Social Network Analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38, 784-796. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12648
Yin, J., Narang, N., Thomas, P., & Paris, C. (2012). Unifying Local and Global Agreement and Disagreement Classification in Online Debates. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop in Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis (pp. 61-69). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Yu, Z. (2021). The Effects of Gender, Educational Level, and Personality on Online Learning Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article No. 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00252-3
Zhang, Z., Liu, T., Gao, X., & Lee, C. B. (2024). A Longitudinal Examination of Language Learners’ Group-Level Enjoyment and Emotion Regulation in Online Collaborative Learning. Language Teaching Research . https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241227584
Zhao, Y., Wang, N., Li, Y., Zhou, R., & Li, S. (2021). Do Cultural Differences Affect Users’ E‐Learning Adoption? A Meta‐Analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52, 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13002
Zhou, J., & Ye, J. (2024). Investigating Cognitive Engagement Patterns in Online Collaborative Learning: A Temporal Learning Analytic Study. Interactive Learning Environments . https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2299976