Beyond Mere Words: Unveiling the Speech Acts behind Netanyahu’s October 7 Speech
- 1 Department of English Language and Literature, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon
Abstract
Pragmatics, especially speech act theory, is crucial for analyzing political discourse. It goes beyond simple information exchange to reveal the strategic use of language for influence, persuasion, and action. This paper investigates the speech acts employed by Netanyahu in his speech delivered on 7 October, 2023, considering both his intent and the contextual circumstances surrounding his utterance. Findings revealed that 38.46% of Netanyahu’s speech is dedicated to assertives, 23.07% to directives, 15.38% to declaratives and 7.69% to commissives. Two statements were employed for two different purposes: assertive-directive (7.69%) and declarative-commissive (7.69%). Combining assertions with directives and declarations indicates that the speech emphasizes the delivery of information and action taken, with a degree of authority and commitment. This analysis also suggests that, through a strategic use of language, the speaker employs a calculated approach which aims to inform, guide, and persuade, emphasizing authority and purpose over emotional expression. However, this study, while offering insights into Netanyahu’s communication, is limited by its dependence on a single speech, which might possibly misrepresent his overall style and neglect broader contextual factors. To achieve a more comprehensive understanding and validate the findings, future research should expand data sources by analyzing more speeches for the same speaker, incorporate a wider contextual analysis, and investigate audience reception.
- Addae, A., Alhassan, H., & Kyeremeh, Y. S. (2022). Discursive Strategies of Ideological Representations in Political Speeches: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected Speeches of Kwame Nkrumah. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 6, 141-162. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v6i2.396
- Alqahtani, H. A. (2024). Impact of Use of Language on Audience’s Perception: A Qualitative Analysis of Speeches by Hillary Clinton. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9, 293. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n3p293
- Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words . Harvard University Press.
- Awal, A. (2022). Legal and Political Intervention on Language Issues in Bangladesh: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability, 2, 22-35. https://doi.org/10.30659/ijsunissula.2.1.22-35
- Baider, F. (2019). Double Speech Act: Negotiating Inter-Cultural Beliefs and Intra-Cultural Hate Speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.006
- Bull, P., & Waddle, M. (2021). Speaker-Audience Intercommunication in Political Speeches: A Contrast of Cultures. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.001
- Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor . Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Chilton, P. (2004). A nalysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice . Routledge.
- De Stefani, E., & De Marco, D. (2019). Language, Gesture, and Emotional Communication: An Embodied View of Social Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2063. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02063
- Dunmire, P. L. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 735-751. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.365
- Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of Power : Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy . University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226210735.001.0001
- Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research . Routledge.
- Fogal, D., Harris, D., & Matt M. (2018). New Work on Speech Acts . Oxford University Press.
- Gao, H., Yu, T., & Cannella, A. A. (2016). The Use of Public Language in Strategy: A Multidisciplinary Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 42, 21-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315615675