Impoliteness Responses to Immorality in Online Comments: A Case from Sina Weibo
- 1 Foreign Languages College, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China
- 2 Foreign Languages College, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China
Abstract
This study investigates impoliteness responses to immorality in online comments through a case involving a man repeatedly verbally abusing two construction workers because their work clothes were stained with dust on Line 5 of the Beijing subway on April 17, 2025, posted by Hong Xing News , a news agency in China, on Sina Weibo , a popular social media platform in China. The analysis examines how Sina Weibo users make impoliteness responses in this context, and the real reason behind these comments, in terms of morality. The findings reveal that these Sina Weibo users employ 13 impoliteness response strategies in total, including three broad strategies and 12 subcategories. In addition, the real reason behind these comments is the man’s violation of moral principles of equality, and laborers should be held in high esteem, highlighting the Sina Weibo users’ strong determination to condemn immorality.
- Bou-Franch, P. (2022). Morality, Aggression, and Social Activism in a Transmedia Sports Controversy. Language & Communication, 84, 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.001
- Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167
- Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Gumperz, J. J. (1987). Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage . Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511813085
- Chen, Q., & Ran, Y. P. (2019). The Interpersonal Impoliteness of Online Offence and Its Negative Pragmatic Effects. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 6, 48-56. (In Chinese)
- Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
- Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness : Using Language to Cause Offence . Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511975752
- Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., & Wichmann, A. (2003). Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1545-1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00118-2
- Gao, X., & Liu, Q. (2023). Dynamics and Evaluations of Impoliteness: Evidence from Short Videos of Passenger Disputes and Public Comments. Journal of Pragmatics, 203, 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.11.012
- Haidt, J. (2003). The Moral Emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Gold-Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences (pp. 852-870). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195126013.003.0045
- Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x
- Hardaker, C., & McGlashan, M. (2016). “Real Men Don’t Hate Women”: Twitter Rape Threats and Group Identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005
- Haugh, M., Kádár, D. Z., & Márquez Reiter, R. (2022). Offence and Morality: Pragmatic Perspectives. Language & Communication, 87, 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.07.005
- Holmes, J., Marra, M., & Schnurr, S. (2008). Impoliteness and Ethnicity: Māori and Pākehā Discourse in New Zealand Workplaces. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour , Culture, 4, 193-219. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2008.010