Most studies on the relationship between lexical sophistication and writing quality operationalize lexical sophistication as distributional property of words and focus on argumentative essays. This study examines the various aspects of lexical sophistication of EFL engineering students’ project proposals, comparing them with argumentative essays to explore genre-specific lexical features. Twenty-two indices of various dimensions of lexical sophistication were extracted from both project proposals and argumentative essays written by students with comparable English proficiency. Independent samples t tests revealed significant differences in lexical sophistication between the two genres. An exploratory factor analysis grouped the 22 indices of project proposals into five components. A stepwise multiple regression analysis using these components as predictors suggested that lexical sophistication exhibited limited explanatory power for project proposal quality, contrasting with its established role in general L2 writing contexts. The findings suggest pedagogical implications for ESP instruction, highlighting the integration of discipline-specific terminology, structural coherence, and contextualized function word usage to enhance engineering students’ genre-specific communicative efficacy in project proposal writing.
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and Neighborhood Effects on Lexical Access: Activation or Search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.15.5.802
Baese-Berk, M. M., Drake, S., Foster, K., Lee, D., Staggs, C., & Wright, J. M. (2021). Lexical Diversity, Lexical Sophistication, and Predictability for Speech in Multiple Listening Conditions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID: 661415. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661415
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B. et al. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193014
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing . Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511621024
BNC Consortium (2007). British National Corpus . http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and Operationalising L2 Complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Language Learning & Language Teaching (pp. 21-46). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.02bul
Cheng, A. (2025). Genre and ESP. In S. Starfield, & C. A. Hafner (Eds.), The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes (2nd ed., pp. 149-165). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119985068.ch8
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33, 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400805
Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic Analysis of Grant Proposals: European Union Research Grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(97)00026-4
Coxhead, A. (2000). A New Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213-238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951
Crossley, S. A., & Skalicky, S. (2019). Examining Lexical Development in Second Language Learners: An Approximate Replication of Salsbury, Crossley & Mcnamara (2011). Language Teaching, 52, 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444817000362
Crossley, S. A., Cai, Z., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Syntagmatic, Paradigmatic, and Automatic N-Gram Approaches to Assessing Essay Quality. In P. M. McCarthy, & G. M. Youngblood (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th international Florida artificial intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference (pp. 214-219). The AAAI Press.
Crossley, S., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. (2009). Measuring L2 Lexical Growth Using Hypernymic Relationships. Language Learning, 59, 307-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00508.x
Crossley, S., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. (2010). The Development of Polysemy and Frequency Use in English Second Language Speakers. Language Learning, 60, 573-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00568.x
Dascalu, M., McNamara, D., Crossley, S., & Trausan-Matu, S. (2016). Age of Exposure: A Model of Word Learning. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 30, 2928-2934. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10372
Durrant, P., & Brenchley, M. (2019). Development of Vocabulary Sophistication across Genres in English Children’s Writing. Reading and Writing, 32, 1927-1953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9932-8
Durrant, P., Moxley, J., & McCallum, L. (2019). Vocabulary Sophistication in First-Year Composition Assignments. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24, 33-66. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17052.dur
Eguchi, M., & Kyle, K. (2020). Continuing to Explore the Multidimensional Nature of Lexical Sophistication: The Case of Oral Proficiency Interviews. The Modern Language Journal, 1 04, 381-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12637
Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7287.001.0001
Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (5th ed.). Sage.
Flowerdew, L. (2016). A Genre-Inspired and Lexico-Grammatical Approach for Helping Postgraduate Students Craft Research Grant Proposals. English for Specific Purposes, 42, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.10.001
Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Predicting Human Judgments of Essay Quality in Both Integrated and Independent Second Language Writing Samples: A Comparison Study. Assessing Writing, 18, 218-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
Higginbotham, G., & Reid, J. (2019). The Lexical Sophistication of Second Language Learners’ Academic Essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.002
Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing . University of Michigan Press/ELT. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927
Jarvis, S. (2013). Defining and Measuring Lexical Diversity. In S. Jarvis, & M. Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary Knowledge: Human Ratings and Automated Measures (pp. 13-43). John Benjamins.
Juanggo, W. (2018). Investigating Lexical Diversity and Lexical Sophistication of Productive Vocabulary in the Written Discourse of Indonesian EFL Learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 38-48. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11462
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing Textual Features Characterizing Structural Variation in Research Articles across Three Engineering Sub-Discipline Corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 74-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008
Kim, M., Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. (2018). Lexical Sophistication as a Multidimensional Phenomenon: Relations to Second Language Lexical Proficiency, Development, and Writing Quality. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 120-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12447
Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-Acquisition Ratings for 30,000 English Words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 978-990. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. (2016). The Relationship between Lexical Sophistication and Independent and Source-Based Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2015). Automatically Assessing Lexical Sophistication: Indices, Tools, Findings, and Application. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 757-786. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.194
Kyle, K., Crossley, S., & Berger, C. (2018). The Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Lexical Sophistication (TAALES): Version 2.0. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 1030-1046. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0924-4
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary Size and Use: Lexical Richness in L2 Written Production. Applied Linguistics, 16, 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307
Lei, S., & Yang, R. (2020). Lexical Richness in Research Articles: Corpus-Based Comparative Study among Advanced Chinese Learners of English, English Native Beginner Students and Experts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 47, Article 100894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100894
Loewen, S., & Gonulal, T. (2015). Exploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Components Analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research (, pp. 182-212). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870908-9
Lu, X., & Hu, R. (2021). Sense-Aware Lexical Sophistication Indices and Their Relationship to Second Language Writing Quality. Behavior Research Methods, 54, 1444-1460. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01675-6
McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2001b). Rethinking the Word Frequency Effect: The Neglected Role of Distributional Information in Lexical Processing. Language and Speech, 44, 295-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309010440030101
McDonald, S., & Shillcock, R. (2001a). Contextual Distinctiveness: A New Lexical Property Computed from Large Corpora . (Informatics Research Report; No. EDI-INF-RR-0042). School of Informatics.
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education . Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030199
Plonsky, L., & Gonulal, T. (2015). Methodological Synthesis in Quantitative L2 Research: A Review of Reviews and a Case Study of Exploratory Factor Analysis. Language Learning, 65, 9-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12111
Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary . Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511732942
Salsbury, T., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Psycholinguistic Word Information in Second Language Oral Discourse. Second Language Research, 27, 343-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310395851
Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An Academic Formulas List: New Methods in Phraseology Research. Applied Linguistics, 31, 487-512. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058
Sun, K., & Lu, X. (2021). Assessing Lexical Psychological Properties in Second Language Production: A Dynamic Semantic Similarity Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID: 672243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672243
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
Tracy-Ventura, N. (2017). Combining Corpora and Experimental Data to Investigate Language Learning during Residence Abroad: A Study of Lexical Sophistication. System, 71, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.022
Vögelin, C., Jansen, T., Keller, S. D., Machts, N., & Möller, J. (2019). The Influence of Lexical Features on Teacher Judgements of ESL Argumentative Essays. Assessing Writing, 39, 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.003
Williams, B., Onsman, A., & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Five-Step Guide for Novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 8, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.8.3.93
Zhang, X., Lu, X., & Li, W. (2021). Beyond Differences: Assessing Effects of Shared Linguistic Features on L2 Writing Quality of Two Genres. Applied Linguistics, 43, 168-195. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab007
Zheng, Y. (2016). The Complex, Dynamic Development of L2 Lexical Use: A Longitudinal Study on Chinese Learners of English. System, 56, 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.11.007
Zhou, X., Gao, Y., & Lu, X. (2023). Lexical Complexity Changes in 100 Years’ Academic Writing: Evidence from Nature Biology Letters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, Article 101262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101262