Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Effect of Animacy on Word Order Processing in Kaqchikel Maya
Functional Brain Imaging Lab, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Ohbu, Japan
Graduate School of Languages and Cultures, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
- 1 Functional Brain Imaging Lab, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Ohbu, Japan
- 2 Graduate School of Languages and Cultures, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
- 3 Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
- 4 Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
Open Journal of Modern Linguistics·Volume 03 (2013)·Pages 203–207·Published 9 August 2013·DOI10.4236/ojml.2013.33027
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
This study investigated the processing load of transitive sentences in two different basic word orders (i.e., VOS and SVO) in Kaqchikel Maya, with a particular focus on the animacy of the object. The results of a sentence plausibility judgment task showed that VOS sentences were processed faster than SVO sentences regardless of the animacy of the object. This supports the traditional analysis in Mayan linguistics that, although SVO is the most frequently used word order, the syntactically determined basic word order is VOS in Kaqchikel, as in many other Mayan languages. More importantly, the results suggest that the processing load in Kaqchikel sentence comprehension is more strongly affected by syntactic canonicity than production frequency or object animacy.
KeywordsAnimacySentence ProcessingSO Word Order PreferenceSyntaxKaqchikel
- Ajsivinac Sian, J. E., García Mátzar, L. P. O., Cutzal, M. C., & Alonzo Guaján, I. E. (2004). Gramática descriptiva del idioma maya Ka qchikel: Rutzijoxik rucholik ri Kaqchikel ch’ab’al. Academia de las Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala, Comunidad Lingüística Kaqchikel.
- Aissen, J. L. (1992). Topic and focus in Mayan. Language, 68, 43-80.
- Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduc tion to statistics using R. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801686
- Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1999). Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psy cholinguistic Research, 28, 121-143. doi:10.1023/A:1023206208142
- Bock, K., & Warren, K. R. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntac tic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21, 47-67. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90023-X
- Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341-345.
- Brown, R. M., Maxwell, J. M., & Little, W. E. (2006). La ütz awach?: Introduction to Kaqchikel Maya language. Austin: University of Te xas Press.
- Caplan, D., Chen, E., & Waters, G. (2008). Task-dependent and task independent neurovascular responses to syntactic processing. Cortex, 44, 257-275. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2006.06.005
- Coon, J. (2010). VOS as predicate fronting in Chol Mayan. Lingua, 120, 345-378. doi:10.1016/j.lingua. 2008.07.006
- England, N. C. (1991). Changes in basic word order in Mayan lan guages. International Journal of American Linguistics, 57, 446-486.
- Erdocia, K., Laka, I., Mestres-Missé, A., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2009). Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolution in a free word order language: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque. Brain and Language, 109, 1-17. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.003
- García Matzar, L. P., & Rodríguez Guaján, P. B’. J. O. (1997). Rukemik ri Kaqchikel chi’: Gramática kaqchikel. Guatemala City: Cholsamaj.
- Gennari, S., Mirkovic, J., & MacDonald, M. (2012). Animacy and com petition in relative clause production: A cross-linguistic investigation. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 141-176. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych. 2012.03.002
- Gibson, E. (2000). Dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium (pp. 95-126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.