This study investigated politeness in workplace emails that were written in a Malaysian educational institute. It examined the use of politeness strategies in relation to the ethnicity of the communicators, power relations and social distance. Previous research on Malaysian workplace emails revealed that Malaysians usually use the direct imperative or declarative politeness strategies in emails. This study however, revealed that the Malaysian employees (i.e., Malay, Chinese Malaysians, Indian Malaysians) mainly used the indirect positive and negative politeness strategies. This is the case to establish rapport and connect with the recipient on the personal level. The study also revealed that social distance played a more significant role than power imbalance as Malaysians, in general, seemed more polite to distant colleagues than they were to close colleagues.
Abdullah, N. A. (2003). Relational Communication in Organization E-Mail: A Malaysian Case Study. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.
Akar, D. (1998). Patterns and Variations in Contemporary Written Business Communication in Turkey: A Genre Study of Four Companies. Unpublished Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
AlAfnan, M. A. (2012). Power, Social Distance and Ethnicity: An Investigation into the Framing Moves of Workplace Emails. Proceedings of PALing International Conference on Linguistics. http://mylibraryfriends.com/read/1341469608_power--social-distance-and-ethnicity.pdf
Alatalo, P. (2002). Repair Work Interaction in Business E-Mail Messages, with Special Reference to Interpersonal Metadiscourse. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla.
Angell, D., & Heslop, B. (1999). The Elements of E-Mail Style. New York: Addison Wesley.
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., & Harris, S. (2006). Politeness at Work: Issues and Challenges. Journal of Politeness Research, 2, 733.
Bishop, L., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Computer-Mediated Communication as Employee Voice: A Case Study. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52, 213-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2525163
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, Y. Y., & Hsu, Y.-P. (1998). Requests on E-Mail: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. RELC Journal, 29, 121-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900206
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486999
Gains, J. (1999). Electronic Mail—A New Style of Communication or Just a New Medium? An Investigation into the Text Features of E-Mail. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 81-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00051-3
Grindsted, A. (1997). Joking as a Strategy in Spanish and Danish Negotiations. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini, & S. Harris (Eds.), The Languages of Business: An International Perspective (pp. 159-182). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Kankaanranta, A. (2001). “Check the Figures”—Variation in English Email Requests by Finnish and Swedish Writers. In M. Charles, & P. Hiidenmaa (Eds.), Tietotyonyhteiskunta: Kielenvaltakunta. AFinLA Yearbook (Vol. 59, pp. 304-337). Jyvaskyla: AfinLA.
Kong, K. C. C. (1998). Politeness of Service Encounters in Hong Kong. Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association, 8, 555-575. http://ipra.ua.ac.be/main.aspx?c=*HOME&n=1267
Lakoff, R. (1973). The Logic of Politeness: Or, Minding Your p’s and q’s. Chicago Linguistic Society, 8, 292-305.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.
Maier, P. (1992). Politeness Strategies in Business Letters by Native and Non-Native English Speakers. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 189-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(05)80009-2
McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1968). War and Peace in the Global Village: An Inventory of Some of the Current Spastic Situations That Could Be Eliminated by More Feedforward. New York: Bantam.
Harun, M. (2007). Malay-Chinese Interethnic Communication in Malaysia: An Analysis of Sensemaking in Everyday Experiences. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. http://etd.uum.edu.my/2094/1/Harun_Minah.pdf
Mulholland, J. (1999). E-mail: Uses, Issues and Problems in an Institutional Setting. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini, & C. Nickerson (Eds.), Writing Business: Genres, Media and Discourses (pp. 57-84). London: Longman.
Ng, Y. K. (2003). A Discourse Analysis of E-Mail Messages in a Malaysian Business Community. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 3. http://eprints.ukm.my/227/1/GemaVol3.1.2003No3.pdf
Nickerson, C. (1999). The Use of English in Electronic Mail in a Multinational Corporation. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini, & C. Nickerson (Eds.), Writing Business: Genres, Media and Discourses (pp. 35-55). London: Longman.
Paarlahti, S. (1998). Politeness Strategies in Business Letters Written by Non-Native and Native Speakers of English. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla.
Shapiro, N., & Anderson, R. (1985). Toward an Ethics and Etiquette for Electronic Mail. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
Sheer, V. C. (2000). Conflict Process in China’s International Export Trading: Impact of the Chinese Culture and the Trading Culture. Intercultural Communication Studies, 9, 47-69. http://www.uri.edu/iaics/content/2000v9n2/3%20Vivian%20C.%20Sheer.pdf
Swangboonsatic, C. (2006). Text and Context in International Trade Communication: A Case Study of E-Mail: Business Communication among Professionals in the Asia-Pacific Region. Doctoral Dissertation, Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology. http://eprints.vu.edu.au/480/
Treece, M. (1994). Successful Communication for Business and the Professions. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Yli-Jokipii, H. (1994). Requests in Professional Discourse: A Cross-Cultural Study of British, American and Finnish Business Writing. In Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae (p. 71). Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
Ziv, O. (1996). Writing to Work: How Using Email Can Reflect Technological and Organizational Change. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 243-264). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.19ziv