Persuasion in Jesus Christ’s Humour: A Linguistic Analysis
- 1 College of Education for Human Sciences, University of Babylon, Babylon, Iraq
- 2 College of Education for Women, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq
Abstract
Believers and non-believers think that religion and humour do not go together well but in fact they are more integrative. Humour has been identified as a pathway to spiritual wisdom. It is rare to find a religion, including Christianity, that does not include laughter and humour in one form or another such as myths, rituals etc. The divine laughter and humour represent the relationship between humans and religions. It is an instrument for putting humans in their place in relation to divine beings. Humour which is not spiritual is of no significance to religion. The present study is oriented primarily towards presenting humour in Jesus Christ’s Biblical Verses in the New Testament. A linguistic analysis of selected verses is carried out by searching figures of speech, such metaphor according to Kostler (1964), as a rhetoric device, and how by its flouting Grice Maxims (1975) gives rise to laughter. Besides, following Attardo’s (1994) and Raskin’s (1985) scripts, the study discusses how the oppositeness of the real/unreal scripts clash and evoke laughter. The results show that humour in these verses is a device of persuasion since the main aim of the process of flouting Grice Maxims by the rhetorical figures of speech is to achieve persuasion.
- Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. New York, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Bakhtin, M. (1968). Rabelais and His World. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Bakhtin, M. (1994 [1981]). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
- Cegala, D. J. (1987). Persuasive Communication: Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). Edina, Mn: Burgess International.
- Dave, L. (2008). Subliminal Persuasion. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Davis, W. (1998). Implicature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663796
- Eco, U. (1980). The Name of the Rose. English Translation (1983) by Harcourt, Inc. and Martin Secker & Warburge Limited.
- Geybels, H. (2011) The Redemptive Power of Humour in Religion. In H. Geybels, & W. van Herck (Eds.), Humour and Religion: Challenges and Ambiguities. Proceedings of a Congress, 20-21 April 2009, University Centre Saint Ignatius Antwerp.
- Gilhus, I. S. (1997). Laughing Gods, Weeping Virgins: Laughter in the History of Religion. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203411605
- Grice, P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, New York: Academic Press.
- Herrick, A. J. (2012). The History and Theory of Rhetoric. London: Routledge.
- Joeckel, S. (2008). Funny as Hell: Christianity and Humor Reconsidered. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 21, 415-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humr.2008.020
- Kennedy, G. A. (2007). Aristotle, on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, Translated with Introduction, Notes and Appendices (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson & Co.
- Lakoff, R. (1982). Persuasive Discourse and Ordinary Conversation, with Examples from Advertising. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk (pp. 25-42). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Marciniak, P. (2011). Laughing against All the Odds. Some Observations on Humour, Laughter and Religion in Byzantium. In H. Geybels, & W. van Herck (Eds.), Humour and Religion: Challenges and Ambiguities (pp. 141-155). London: Continuum.