Criticizing as a Measurement of the Power Relations within Chinese Working Couples
- 1 School of Foreign Languages, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China
- 2 School of Foreign Languages, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China
Abstract
This study inquires into Chinese working couples’ (both the husband and the wife have a paid job) marital power relations manifested in their use of face-threatening utterances in family situations. A quantitative approach is adopted and the data come from 4 commonly-accepted “realistic” Chinese TV dramas committed to contemporary Chinese working couple’s family life. First, we identify the strategies character couples utilize to criticize their spouse and also those they use to respond to spousal criticisms, and categorize them into different types according to their face-threatening intensity. Then the differences between husbands and wives in their use of these different types of strategies (in both making and responding to criticisms) are compared quantitatively. An analysis of these differences indicates that while no significant power differences are found in their ways to criticize their spouse, working wives demonstrate more power than working husbands in responding to the criticisms from their spouse. Overall, Chinese working wives have the same or even more marital power in conjugal relationship. This finding mirrors what has been proved in other research fields, that is, women’s marital power has been generally enhanced since the foundation of New China in 1949. In addition, we also find that working husbands are more inclined to avoid the criticisms from their wife and thus the involvement into marital confrontation, which reflects and verifies traditional Chinese stereotypes and expectations on men that they should be more generous and tolerant than women.
- Bilmes, J. (1988). The Concept of Preference in Conversation Analysis. Language in Society, 17, 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012744
- Boxer, D. (2002). Nagging: The Familial Conflict Arena. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00022-4
- Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Chien, W. Y., & Yi, C. C. (2014). Marital Power Structure in Two Chinese Societies: Measurement and Mechanisms. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 45, 93-111.
- Chu, C. Y. C., & Yu, R. R. (2010). Understanding Chinese Families: A Comparative Study and Southeast China. Oxford: Oxford University.
- Cong, Z., & Silverstein, M. (2008). Intergenerational Support and Depression among Elders China: Do Daughters-in-Law Matter? Journal of Marriage & Family, 70, 599-612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00508.x
- Dersley, I., & Wootton, A. (2000). Complaint Sequences within Antagonistic Argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 375-406. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_02
- Drew, P. (1998). Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 295-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
- Du, F. Q., & Wang, Z. (2004). Women and Gender in Chinese History. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House.
- Fiske, J. (1989). Reading the Popular. Cornwall: Routledge.
- Fiske, J. (2005). Reading the Popular. Taylor & Francis e-Library. www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk
- Fiske, J., & Hartley, J. (2003). Reading Television. Cornwall: Routledge.
- Garcia, A. (1991). Dispute Resolution without Disputing: How the Interactional Organization of Mediation Hearings Minimizes Argument. American Sociological Reviews, 56, 818-835. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096258
- Gruber, H. (1998). Disagreeing: Sequential Placement and Internal Structure of Disagreements in Conflict Episodes. Text, 18, 467-503. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.4.467
- Hutchby, I. (1996). Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
- Kotthoff, H. (1993). Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures. Language in Society, 22, 193-216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017103