Conceptuality and Context-Sensitivity of Emotive Interjections
- 1 School of Foreign Languages, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China
Abstract
Due to their heterogeneous and multi-functional property, interjections investigated in this paper are narrowed down to emotive interjections only. A respective subdivision of primary and secondary interjections is made at the beginning for a better elaboration on the following topic concerning the subtle relation between conceptuality and context-sensitivity of interjections. Specific discussions unfold around three questions: 1) Does interjections encode any conceptual content? 2) To what degree do these concepts differ with regard to the five different subtypes of emotive interjections? 3) From the perspective of interjections’ conceptuality, what functions would context perform in encoding the hidden emotive messages? Furthermore, in view of the oral nature of interjections, paralinguistic and gestural factors also count very much in the interpretation of interjections. The conclusion is presented by reflecting on several improvable aspects in the paper which are worthy of further study.
- Ameka, F. (1992). Interjections: The Universal yet Neglected Part of Speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90048-G
- Cruz, M. P. (2009). Might Interjections Encode Concepts? More Questions than Answers. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 5, 241-270. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-009-0015-9
- Cuenca, M. J. (2000). Defining the Indefinable? Interjection. Syntaxis, 3, 29-44.
- Gao, Y. M. (2001). How Interjections Realize the Tenor of Discourse. Foreign Language Education, 3, 14-18.
- Gehweiler, E. (2008). From Proper Name to Primary Interjection: The Case of Gee! Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 9, 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.9.1.05geh
- Li, C. H. (2007). Exploring the Cognitive Motivation and Pragmatic Function of Interjections. Foreign Language Research, 3, 118-122.
- Nenova, N., Joue, G., Reilly, R., & Carson-Berndsen, J. (2001). Sound and Function Regularities in Interjections. In: Proceedings of Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (pp. 49-52). Edinburgh, Scotland.
- Norrick, N. R. (2007). Discussion Article: Pragmatic Markers, Interjections and Discourse. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 6, 159-168.
- Norrick, N. R. (2009). Interjections as Pragmatic Markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 866-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.005
- O’Connell, D. C., & Kowal, S. (2008). Communicating with One Another—Toward a Psychology of Spontaneous Spoken Discourse (pp. 133-141). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77632-3
- O’Connell, D. C., & Kowal, S. (2010). Interjections in the Performance of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9138-y
- O’Connell, D. C., Kowal, S., & Ageneau, C. (2005). Interjections in Interviews. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-3636-3
- O’Connell, D. C., Kowal, S., & King, S. P. (2007). Interjections in Literary Readings and Artistic Performance. Pragmatics, 17, 417-438. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.3.04con
- Sauciuc, G. (2006). Borrowing—A Source of Innovation in the Class of Interjections. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 51, 267-300.
- Wang, F. Y. (1999). On Exclamatory Word—The Semantic Comparison of English and Chinese Interjections. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 1, 17-20.