Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution of Cantonese-English Bilinguals: Evidence from Prepositional Phrase and Adverb
- 1 China University of Petroleum Beijing, At Karamay, Karamay City, China
Abstract
Syntactic ambiguity resolution is influenced by multiple constraints. A sentence-picture matching task tested the attachment of prepositional phrase (PP) such as on the chair within an utterance like Mary ate the apple on the chair. PP attaching to NP2 (the apple) is called low attachment (LA), while PP attaching to V (ate) is called high attachment (HA). A comprehension task tested the attachment of adverb such as quickly within an utterance like the story Mary was reading quickly put her little sister into sleep. The checked adverbs attaching to the verb of the embedded clause (VEC) and to the verb of the main clause (VMC) were analyzed. Cantonese-English bilinguals were grouped according to their L2 proficiency. Results reflected that 1) both groups showed preference to HA for PP, 2) LP group showed preference to VMC for adverb attachment; 3) there is a large gap in LA between LP and HP, suggesting that syntactic ambiguity resolution involves interaction of all the information available. The relationship between language proficiency and parsing is not so definitely supported by the results.
- Boland, J. E., & Blodgett, A. (2006). Argument Status and PP-Attachment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 385-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9021-z
- Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2005). Priming Prepositional-Phrase Attachment during Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 31, 468-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.468
- Carson T., & Gibson E. ,et al. (1999). Prepositional Phrase Attachment Journal of Memory and Language 40, 409-431.
- Clifton, C., Speer, S., & Abney, S. P. (1991). Parsing Arguments: Phrase Structure and Argument Structure as Determinants of Initial Parsing Decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 251-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90006-6
- Dussias, P. E. (2003). Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Learners: Some Effects of Bilinguality on L1 and L2 Processing Strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 529-557. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000238
- Dussias, P. E., & Sagarra, N. (2007). The Effect of Language Exposure on Syntactic Parsing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002847
- Felser, C., Roberts, L., Gross, R., & Marinis, T. (2003). The Processing of Ambiguous Sentences by First and Second Language Learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 453-89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000237
- Frazier, L., & Clifton Jr., C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The Sausage Machine: A New Two-Stage Parsing Model. Cognition, 6, 291-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1
- Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution While Reading in Second and Native Languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 119-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/027249897392251
- Gass, S. M., & Lee, J. (2011). Working Memory Capacity, inhibitory Control, and Proficiency in a Second Language. Studies in Bilingualism, 43, 59-84. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.43.06gas
- Hoppa, H. (2014). Working Memory Effects in the L2 Processing of Ambiguous Relative Clauses. Language Acquisition, 21, 250-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2014.892943
- Juffs, A. (1998). Main verb vs. Reduced Relative Clause Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Sentence Processing. Language Learning, 48, 107-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00034