Semantic Grammaticalization in the Construction “N<sub>1</sub> you V guo N<sub>2</sub>” from Neo-Cognitive Pragmatic Perspective
- 1 School of Foreign Studies, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, China
Abstract
The construction “N 1 you V guo N 2 ” pervasively visible in China has demonstrated its typical cog-pragmatic features. It is pointed out that “you” and “guo” in this construction are the results of notional verbs’ grammaticalization. Grammatical features and cognitive motivation of it have been discussed based on the project theory and de-categorization theory. In its grammaticalization and pragmaticalization process the pragmatic markers contribute the most. Considering the integrated meaning from social, pragmatic and cognitive perspectives, it is found that the construction is out of the speaker’s particular intention, also the results of pragmaticalization.
- Aijmer, K. (1996). Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.
- Bisang, W. et al. (2004). What Makes Grammaticalization?—A Look from Its Fringes and Its Components. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197440
- Chen, B. Q. (2004). Origin and Extinction of Modal Particles “zai” and “you”. Chinese Character Culture, 4, 32.
- Chen, Q. R., & Wang, J. H. (2010). Multi-Functional Analysis of South Dialect “you” Clauses. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 4, 47.
- Chen, Y. L. (2011). Modern Chinese Project Tutorial. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.
- Dong, X. F. (2004). Main Verb “you meiyou” in Modern Chinese. Language Teaching and Research, 2, 1-3.
- Fang, M. (2005). Grammaticalization of Authentication-Meaning Predicate-Objective Verb—From Predicate-Objective Verb to Pragmatic Marker. Studies of the Chinese Language, 6, 504-505.
- Fraser, B. (1996). Pragmatic Markers. Pragmatics, 6, 23-26. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra
- Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticaliztion. Cambridge: CUP.
- Hou, G. J. (2007). Grammaticalization and Pragmaticalization: Investigated from Perspectives of Cognitive-Pragmatic and Pragma-Translatology. Journal of Chongqing University, 5, 119-122.
- Hou, G. J. (2008). Dominant Pragmatic Issues and the Way to Pragmatranslatology. Chengdu: Sichuan University Press.
- Hou, G. J. (2013). Criticism of the Eight Faults in Construction Grammar. Foreign Languages Research, 3, 2-11.
- Hyman, L. M. (1984). Form and Substance in Language Universals. In B. Butterworth et al. (Eds.), Explanations or Language Universals (pp. 67-85). Berlin: Mouton.
- Millet, A. (1912). L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia (Revisita di Scienza), 12, 130-148.
- Qiu, S. D. (2011). Pragmaticalization and Pragmatic Markers. Foreign Languages in China, 3, 30-36.
- Shi, Y. Z. (2004). The Effect of Social Average Value on Grammar: The Motivation for the Emergence of Scalar Meaning of “you”. Language Science, No. 6, 16-26.
- Sun, C. F. (1994). Comments on Grammaticalization Theory. Foreign Linguistics, 4, 19-25.
- Taylor, J. R. (1996). Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press/Clarendon.