Positive Impact of Utilizing More Formative Assessment over Summative Assessment in the EFL/ESL Classroom
- 1 School of Arts and Humanities, Universidad Católica de El Salvador, Santa Ana, El Salvador
Abstract
Numerous studies about the role of assessment in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL) have been conducted in the last few decades. These studies describe a close connection between language assessment and language teaching. Evidence shows that the way students perceive their results after taking an exam strongly influences their motivation toward using the target language in real communication (Torrance, 2012). In compliance with such studies, this paper provides a general view of language assessment and its implications in the EFL/ESL classroom. The paper aims to provide a general background of language assessment, as well as a contrastive analysis of both summative and formative assessment. The paper approaches the topic from the point of view of both agents involved in the learning process; instructors and students. The findings suggest that students benefit more from formative assessment since it provides them with timely appropriate feedback that helps them shape the way they approach language learning (Huang, 2016). On the other hand, the study highlights that novice teachers usually opt for the traditional summative assessment in order to avoid challenges that formative assessment represents.
- Areiza, H. (2013). The Role of Systematic Formative Assessment on Students’ Views of Their Learning. Australian Journal of Education, 15, 1657-1790.
- Barbosa, M., & Beserra, L. S. (2015). Formative Assessment in the Foreign Language Classroom. BELT: Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 6, 100-109. https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2015.1.20200
- Best, K., Jones-Katz, L., Smolarek, B., Stolzenburg, M., & Williamson, D. (2014). Listening to Our Students: An Exploratory Practice Study of ESL Writing Students’ Views of Feedback. TESOL Journal, 2, n/a-n/a.
- Brookhart, S. M. (2013). The Use of Teacher Judgment for Summative Assessment in the USA. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20, 69-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.703170
- Brown, H. D. (2010). Language Assessment, Principles and Classroom Practices (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Lognman.
- García Laborda, J., Sampson, D. G., Hambleton, R. K., & Guzman, E. (2015). Guest Editorial: Technology Supported Assessment in Formal and Informal Learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18, 1-2. http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=aph&AN=102557855&site=ehost-live
- Giraldo, F. (2018). Language Assessment Literacy: Implications for Language Teachers. PROFILE: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20, 179-195. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n1.62089
- Hedgcock, J. S., & Ferris, D. R. (2014). Teaching L2 Composition Purpose, Process, and Practice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
- Huang, S.-C. (2016). Understanding Learners’ Self-Assessment and Self-Feedback on Their Foreign Language Speaking Performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 803-820. https://doi-org.ezproxy.waterfield.murraystate.edu/10.1080/02602938.2015.1042426 https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1042426
- Jin, Y. (2017). Construct and Content in Context: Implications for Language Learning, Teaching and Assessment in China. Language Testing in Asia, 7, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-017-0032-5
- Ketabi, S., & Ketabi, S. (2014). Classroom and Formative Assessment in Second/Foreign Language Teaching and Learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4, 435-440. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.2.435-440
- Lupton, M. (2012). Reclaiming the Art of Teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 1-11.