The Acquisition and Use of the -S Plural Morpheme by Third-Year Students of English in a Nigerian University
- 1 Department of Language, Arts and Social Science Education, Lagos State University, Ojo, Nigeria
Abstract
This study examined the acquisition and use of the -S plural morpheme by third-year English undergraduates neglected in previous studies involving advanced L2 learners. It aimed at identifying all accurate and inaccurate instantiations of the form, determining their frequency of occurrence, specifying the context of occurrence of each plural bearing or non-bearing common noun, accounting for errors, and suggesting ways of improving L2 learners’ acquisition and use of the English -S plural morpheme. The data comprised 1219 common nouns generated from essays written by 15 volunteer English Education students at the Lagos State University, Nigeria. The Combined CA-EA-IL theory which argues that neither CA nor EA nor IL is sufficiently powerful on its own to account for L2 acquisition guided the study, while syntactic and textual parameters aided the analysis. Findings showed that 93 percent (1132) of the data represent correct usage and 7.14 percent (87) represent incorrect usage. Non-suppliance of the -S plural morpheme in non-obligatory contexts accounted for 74.2 percent (905), while its suppliance in obligatory contexts, non-suppliance in obligatory contexts, and suppliance in non-obligatory contexts respectively represent 18.6 (227), 6.1 (73) and 1.1 (14) percent of the data. Precisely 40 percent of the participants committed 74 percent of the errors, with 43 percent of the non-suppliance-in-obligatory- contexts errors occurring among clausal elements semantically indicating plurality. This implies that successful learning still eluded some learners despite the high level of exposure they got. Evidence of poor learning, ignorance of rules, over-generalisation, and inconsistency abound but only one incontestably L1-influenced error occurred.
- Adams, V. (1973). An Introduction to English Word-Formation. London: Longman.
- Afolayan, A. (1985). Errors and the Teaching of English. In K. R. Janowsky (Ed.), Scientific and Humanistic Dimensions of Language: Festschrift for Robert Lado on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday on May 31, 1985 (pp. 1-14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
- Ajiboye, O. (2010). Plural Marking in Yoruba and English and Its Pedagogical Implications. Sintagma, 22, 17-36. https://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php
- Akande, A. T. (2003). Acquisition of Inflectional Morphemes by Nigerian Learners of English Language. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 12, 310-326. http://www.njas.helsinki/fi
- Amer, F. H. (2009). Phonological and Morphological Issues in Learners’ Performance of English as a Foreign Language. A Case Study of Ninth Grade Students of Tayboh Secondary School for Girls in Malan Governorate, Jordan. Amman, Jordan: Middle East University for Graduate Studies. http://meu.edu.jo/libraryTheses/
- Andrew-Ogidi, R. C. (2006). A Comparative Analysis of English and Igala Morphological Processes. Zaria, Nigeria: Ahmadu Bello University. https://kubanni.abu.edu.ng/jspui/bitstream
- Behjat, F., & Sadighi, F. (2011). The Acquisition of English Grammatical Morphemes: The Case of Iranian EFL Learners. Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3, 105-123. https://www.mjal.org.lib.ed.ac.uk/bistream/handle
- Bliss, H. (2006). L2 Acquisition of Inflectional Morphology: Phonological and Morphophonemic Transfer Effects. In M. G. O’Brien, C. Shea, & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 1-8) Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. www.lingref.com/cpp/gasla/8/paper
- Christophersen, P., & Sandved, A. O. (1969). An Advanced English Grammar. London: Macmillan.
- Feng, L. S. (2012). The Acquisition of Plurals in English Writing by Two Groups of Hong Kong Students. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh. https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/
- Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y. (1997). The Partial Availability of Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition: The Failed Functional Features Hypothesis. Second Language Acquisition, 13, 187-226. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897671476153
- Hazendar, B., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Are there Optional Infinitives in Child L2 Acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 257-268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.