Syntactic Analysis of Kimbeere Relative Clauses
- 1 Tharaka University College, Gatunga, Kenya
- 2 Chuka University, Chuka, Kenya
Abstract
This paper provides a syntactic analysis of noun phrase movement in raising predicates in Kimuthambi. The study is guided by the Principles and Parameters theory by Chomsky & Lasnik (1993) and in particular, the Minimalist Program developed by Chomsky (1995). This theory recognizes that there is always a trigger movement which is the need to check features at an appropriate landing site. The paper demonstrates that Raising in Kimuthambi is triggered by need to check case features. Since raising verbs cannot assign case to a NP, the NP must move to a position in a sentence where it can be assigned case. This according to Carnie (2007) is due to the fact that the NP and the case assigner must be local in such a way that it must be the specifier or the complement of the case assigner, in order to check the feature of case. Case therefore becomes a mandatory trigger for movement of NPs that are not in positions that can be assigned case as in the case of raising predicates. The paper also demonstrates that unlike in English where raising occurs out infinitive clauses only, there is hyper raising in Kimuthambi where raising can occur out of a finite clause.
- Arosio, F., Adani, F., & Guasti, M. T. (2007). Processing Grammatical Features by Italian Children. In Proceedings of GALA 2005. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
- Ashton, E. (1987). Swahili Grammar (Including Intonation). London: Longman.
- Bianchi, V. (1999). Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803372
- Bianchi, V. (2002). Headed Relative Clauses in Generative Syntax-Part II. Glot International, 6, 1-13.
- Bresan, J., & Grimshaw, J. (1978). The Syntax of Free Relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 331-391.
- Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger Publishers.
- Chomsky, N. (1995). Bare Phrase Structure. In G. Webelhuth (Ed.), Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program. Cambridge: Black-well.
- Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. (1993). Principles and Parameters Theory in Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter.
- Cook, V. (1988). Chomsky’s Universal Grammar: An Introduction to Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
- Demirdache, H. (1991). Resumptive Chains in Restrictives, Appositives, and Dislocation Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Groos, A., & Van Riemsdjik, H. C. (1981). Matching Effects in Free Relatives: A Parameter of Core Grammar. In A. Belletti, L. Brandi, & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar: Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference (pp. 171-216). Pisa, Italy: Scuola Normale Superiore.
- Kayne, R. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Keenan, E. (1985). Relative Clauses. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description (Vol. 2, pp. 141-170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lipps, J. (2011). A Lexical-Functional Analysis of Swahili Relative Clauses. Oxford: Oxford University.
- Mohammed, M. (2001). Modern Swahili Grammar. Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers Ltd.
- Vries, M. D. (2013). Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics: “Relative Clauses”. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0120
- Zeller, J. (2004). Relative Clause Formation in the Bantu Languages of South Africa. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 22, 76-93. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610409486361