Diversity in Macrobenthic & Algal Fauna of Limha Pond, Ghutku Bilaspur India
- 1 Department of Zoology, Dr. C.V. Raman University Kota, Bilaspur, India
- 2 Department of Botany, Dr. C.V. Raman University Kota, Bilaspur, India
- 3 Department of Zoology, Govt. Science College Jhanjhgir, Champa, India
- 4 Directorate of Research Services, JNKVV, Jabalpur, India
Abstract
The present study reported on phytoplankton in comparison to the zooplankton in Limha Pond, Ghutku, Bilaspur. The phytoplankton represented in larger number of Cyanophyceae with least density of Dinophyceae and Chlorophyceac , and Bacillariophyceae is the second dominant group. The present study tried to discuss on the problem Macrobenthic fauna of Limha Pond, Ghutku Bilaspur and observed quantitative algal and faunal diversity i.e. phytoplankton (34 species), aquatic organism (6 species) Bacillariophyceae (8 species), Chlorophyceae (11 species), Euglenophyceae (6 species), Zooplankton (20 species), and Fish species (16 species). Present study revealed that Cyprinidae (carps) were the dominant fish and Catla was a major contributor among carps. The following species Catla catla , Labeo rohita , Cirrhinus mrigala , Labeo calbasu , Barbus tor and Cirrhinus reba etc. were noted in Limha pond, Ghutku, Bilaspur.
- Wilson, E.O. (1992) Diversity of Life. W.W. & Company, Inc., Norton, 424.
- World Wildlife Fund (2005) Beyond Belief: Linking Faiths and Protected Areas to Support Biodiversity Conservation. A research Report by WWF, Equilibrium and the Alliance of Religions and Conservation (ARC), Manchester.
- Abbasi, S.A. (1997) Wetlands of India (3)—Wetlands of India: Ecology and Threats (3), The Kuttiadi River Basin. Discovery Pub. House, New Delhi, 65-143.
- Sugunan, V.V. (1997) Fisheries and Management of Small Water Bodies in Seven Countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America. FAO Fisheries Circular, 933, 149.
- Jhingran, A.G. and Unnithan, V.K. (1990) Reservoir Fisheries in India. Proceedings of the National Workshop on Reservoir Fisheries, Manglore, 3-4 January 1990, 106-112.
- Lind, O.T. (1938) A Hand Book of Common Methods in Limnology. 2nd Edition, Kendall Hunt Pub Co., San Francisco, 236.
- Welch, P.S. (1952) Limnological Methods. Blakiston Co., Philadelphia.
- Wetzel, R.G. (1990) Land-Water Interfaces: Metabolic and Limnological Regulators. Verhandlungen der Internationale Vereinigung der Limnologie, 24, 6-24.
- Pennak, R.W. (1946) The Dynamics of Fresh-Water plankton Populations. Ecological Monographs, 16, 340-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1961640
- Wetzell, R.G. (2001) Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystem. 3rd Edition, Academic Press, San Diego.
- Odum, E.P. (1971) Fundamental of Ecology. 3rd Edition, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
- Adoni, A., Joshi, D.G., Gosh, K., Chourasia, S.K., Vaishya, A.K., Yadav, M. and Verma, H.G. (1985) A Work Book on Limnology. Pratibha Publisher, Sagar.
- Shrivastava, G.J. (1968) Fish of Eastern Uttar Pradesh. Vishwa Vidhyalaya Prakashan, Varanasi.
- Schonborn, W. (1962) Dieokologie der Testaceen im Oligotrophen See, Dargestellt am Beispiel des Groben Stechlinsees. Limnologica Berlin, 1, 111-182.
- Sarkar, R. and Krishnamoorthi, K.P. (1977) Biological Method for Monitoring Water Pollution Level: Studies at Nagpur. Indian Journal Environment & Health, 19, 132-139.
- Ruttner-Kolisko, A. (1974) Plankton Rotifers: Biology and Taxonomy. E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 146.
- Pillai, P.P. and Pillai, M.A. (1973) Tidal Influence on the Duel Variations of Zooplankton with Special Reference to Copepods in the Cochin Backwater. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, 15, 411-417.