Two-Hour Creatinine Clearance and Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimated from Serum Cystatin C and Creatinine in the Elderly to Preoperative Period
- 1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Botucatu School of Medicine, S?o Paulo State University (UNESP), S?o Paulo, Brazil
- 2 Department of Anaesthesiology, Botucatu School of Medicine, S?o Paulo State University (UNESP), S?o Paulo, Brazil
- 3 Department of Anaesthesiology, Botucatu School of Medicine, S?o Paulo State University (UNESP), S?o Paulo, Brazil
- 4 Department of Anaesthesiology, Botucatu School of Medicine, S?o Paulo State University (UNESP), S?o Paulo, Brazil
- 5 Department of Anaesthesiology, Botucatu School of Medicine, S?o Paulo State University (UNESP), S?o Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
Introduction: The utility of estimates of glomerular filtration rate based on creatinine and cystatin C serum levels to assess renal function in older surgical patients remains to be determined. Objective: To determine whether 2h-crea tinine clearance (CrCl-2h) can be an adequate substitute for glomerular filtration rate estimates obtained by measuring serum cystatin C and creatinine in the elderly at preoperation. Methods: A total of 102 consecutive elder patients undergoing pre-anesthesia evaluation for routine surgeries were included. Study subjects were allocated into three groups: Group 1 (G1)—hypertensive diabetic patients, Group 2 (G2)—hypertensive patients, and Group 3 (G3)—non-hyper tensive and non-diabetic patients. Two-hour urine collection was performed and CrCl-2h adjusted for ultrasonic residual bladder volume was estimated. GFR was estimated based on creatinine and cystatin C serum levels. Bland-Altman ana lysis was used to compare methods. Results: The mean difference between the evaluated methods and CrCl-2h was <15 mL · min -1 · 1.73 m -2 for Cys-GFR, and >20 mL · min -1 · 1.73 m -2 for Cr-GFR in all groups. CrCl-2h adjusted for ultrasonic residual bladder volume did not differ from non-adjusted CrCl-2h in none of the groups. Conclusion: Two-hour creatinine clearance was not an adequate substitute for GFR estimates based on creatinine and cystatin C serum levels in o lder patients at preoperation. The ultrasonic assessment of residual bladder volume had no significant influence on the calculation of two-hour creatinine clearance.
- S. Klag, P. K. Whelton, B. L. Randall, et al., “Blood Pressure and End-Stage Renal Disease in Men,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 334, No. 1, 1996, pp. 13-18.
- M. C. B. S. Benarab, Y. M. M. Castiglia, P. T. G. Vianna, et al., “Two-Hours Evaluation of Renal Function in the Elderly,” Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2005, pp. 269-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942005000300003
- Y,Yi-sun, C. H. Peng, C. K. Lin, et al., “Use of Serum Cystatin C to Detect Early Decline of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Tape 2 Diabetes,” Intern med., Vol. , No. , 2007, pp. 801-806.
- J. R. Friedman, D. C. Norman and T. T. Yoshikawa, “Correlation of Estimated Renal Function Parameters Versus 24-Hour Creatinine Clearance in Ambulatory Elderly,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 37, No. 2, 1989, pp. 145-149.
- D. D. Cardenas, E. Kelly, J. N. Krieger, et al., “Residual Urine Volumes in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: Measurement with a Portable Ultrasound Instrument,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 69, No. 7, 1988, pp. 514-516.
- M. Gutierrez, G. S. Perez, E. Banderas-Bravo, et al., “Replacement of 24h Creatinine Clearance by 2-h Creatinine in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Single-Center Study,” Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 33, No. 11, 2007, pp. 1900-1906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0745-5
- N. J. Van Den Noortgate, W. H. Janssens, J. R. Delanghe, et al., “Serum Cystatin C Concentration Compared with Other Markers of Glomerular Filtration Rate in the Old Old,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 50, No. 7, 2002, pp.1278-1282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50317.x
- D. W. Cockcroft and M. H. Gault, “Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum Creatinine,” Nephron, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1976, pp. 31-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000180580
- A. Larsson, J. Malm, A. Grubb, et al., “Calculation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Expressed in mL/min from Plasma Cystatin C Values in mg/L,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, Vol. 64, No. 1, 2004, pp. 25-30.
- J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement,” The Lancet, Vol. 327, No. 8476, 1986, pp. 307-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
- D. J. Newman, H. Thakkar, R. G. Edwards, et al., “Serum Cystatin C Measured by Automated Immunoassay: A More Sensitive Marker of Changes in GFR than Serum Creatinine,” Kidney International, Vol. 47, No. , 1995, pp. 312-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.1995.40