Hemodialysis patients’ satisfaction and associated factors in National Teaching Hospital Hemodialysis Center, Cotonou (Benin)
- 1 Department of Nephrology, Borgou Regional Teaching Hospital, Parakou, Benin
- 2 Nephrology-Hemodialysis University Clinic (CUNH), Hubert Koutoukou Maga National Teaching Hospital, Cotonou (CNHU-HKM), Benin
- 3 Nephrology-Hemodialysis University Clinic (CUNH), Hubert Koutoukou Maga National Teaching Hospital, Cotonou (CNHU-HKM), Benin
- 4 Department of Nephrology, Borgou Regional Teaching Hospital, Parakou, Benin
- 5 Department of Psychiatry, Borgou Regional Teaching Hospital, Parakou, Benin
- 6 Department of Psychiatry, Borgou Regional Teaching Hospital, Parakou, Benin
- 7 Department of Psychiatry, Borgou Regional Teaching Hospital, Parakou, Benin
- 8 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin
Abstract
Background: Patients’ satisfaction is a relevant component in assessing healthcare services. The objective of this study was to study the level of satisfaction of chronic hemodialysis patients and the associated factors in Cotonou CNHU-HKM dialysis center. Patients and Methods: It was a cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study conducted by administering a questionnaire on days off dialysis. It was carried out from 1 st November 2015 to 1 st January 2016 in CNHU-HKM Nephrology University Clinic of Cotonou. Hemodialysis patients aged 18 years and above having given their informed consent were included in the study. Patients’ recruitment was comprehensive. Likert scale was used in assessing the level of satisfaction with 4 as “very satisfied” and 1 for “very dissatisfied”. Satisfaction was evaluated on the basis of Ware dimensions. The threshold for satisfaction was 50. Outcomes: Overall, 377 patients were included in the study. Respondents’ mean age was 51.5 ± 13.3 years with 1.37 as sex ratio. Arteriovenous fistula was used for 80.1% of hemodialysis patients. 77.7% of the patients underwent dialysis twice a week while 45.9% were administered a four-hour dialysis. The overall average proportion of “satisfied” was 76.5%. The level of satisfaction was 52% for healthcare environment, 61% for service delivery, 73.9% for healthcare accessibility, 76.1% for healthcare structure, 77.5% for healthcare management, 90.3% for quality of healthcare, 88.3% for interpersonal relationship and 93.2% for efficiency and continuum of healthcare. Factors associated with satisfaction included age (p = 0.02), vascular access (p = 0.04) and urea reduction ratio (p = 0.01). In addition, the degree of satisfaction of hemodialysis patients was not statistically associated with sex, marital status, educational level, history of the disease, age of dialysis, number of sessions per week, and duration per session. Conclusion: The overall level of hemodialysis patients’ satisfaction is above average. There is a need to particularly focus on healthcare environment, so as to better improve the level of satisfaction.
- Bouhabel, A., Laib, Z., Hannache, K. and Aberkane, A. (2014) Renal Replacement Therapy by Hemodialysis in Constantine (Algeria): Overview. Nephrology & Therapeutics, 10, 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2013.07.371
- Cupa, D. (2002) Psychology Nephrology. EDK, Paris, 10-21. https://doi.org/10.3917/edk.cupa.2002.01
- Benghanem Gharbi, M., Dkhissi, H., Fassi Fehri, S. and Lemseffer, Y. (2005) Recommendations of the Moroccan Society of Nephrology for a Comprehensive Strategy for the Management of Chronic Renal Failure. ALD 17, Morocco.
- Berney, C., Fessler, C., Abu Khalil, S., Molliqaj Villard, N. and Arlettaz, Y. (2010) What Does the Diagnosis of Chronic Renal Failure in Geneva? Report Immersion Unit in Medicine. Community Switzerland, 6-7.
- Donabedian, A. (1988) The Quality of Care. How Can It Be Assessed? The Journal of the American Medical Association, 260, 1743-1748. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
- Rodenberg, S.N. (1990) Choosing the Assessment Method that Meets Your Needs. In: Graham, N.O., Ed., Quality Assurance in Hospitals, Aspen Publishers Inc., Rockville, MD.
- Lopez, A. and Remy, P.-L. (2007) Mesures de la satisfaction des usagers des établissements de santé. Rapport No. 2007-045P (MARS 2007). Inspection Générale des Affaires Sociales (IGAS), Paris. [en ligne] http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapports-publics/074000592.pdf
- Haute autorité de la santé (2014) évaluation médico-économique des stratégies de prise en charge de l’insuffisance rénale chronique terminale en France. [en ligne] http://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/c_1775180/fr/evaluation-medico-economique-des-strategies-de-prise-en-charge-de-l-insuffisance-renale-chronique-terminale-en-france
- Driss, Z., El Hocein, D., Loubna, B., et al. (2013) Recommandations de la société marocaine de néphrologie pour une stratégie globale de la prise en charge de l’insuffisance rénale chronique. ALD 17, Maroc.
- Pourin, C., Barberger-Gateau, P., Michel, P. and Solomon, R. (1999) The Satisfaction Measurement of Hospitalized Patients. Part 1: Conceptual Aspects and Review Work. Journal Clinical Oncology, 17, 101-115.
- Esqalli, I., Knidiri, H., Fadili, W., et al. (2013) Are Our Hemodialysis Satisfied with Respect to Care? Nephrology & Therapeutics, 9, 299.
- WMA (2013) Declaration of Helsinki-Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 64th General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013.