Free Will and Determinism: Resolving the Tension
- 1 Swansea University, Swansea, UK
Abstract
Progress may be made in resolving the tension between free will and determinism by analysis of the necessary conditions of freedom. It is of the essence that these conditions include causal and deterministic regularities. Furthermore, the human expression of free will is informed by understanding some of those regularities, and increments in that understanding have served to enhan ce freedom. When the possible character of a deterministic system based o n physical theory is considered, it is judged that, far from implying the elimination of human freedom, such a theory might simply set parameters for it; indeed knowledge of that system could again prove to be in some respects liberating . On the other hand, it is of the essence that the overarching biological framework is not a deterministic system and it foregrounds the behavioural flexibility of humans in being able to choose within a range of options and react to chance occurrences. Furthermore, an issue for determinism flows from the way in which randomness (e.g. using a true random number generator) and chance events could and do enter human life. Once the implications of that issue are fully understood, other elements fit comfortably together in our understanding of freely undertaken action: the contribution of reasons and causes; the fact that reasons are never sufficient to account for outcomes; the rationale for the attribution of praise and blame.
- Al-Khalili, J., & McFadden, J. (2015). Life on the Edge: The Coming of Age of Quantum Biology. Black Swan.
- Anscombe, G. E. M. (1971). Causality and Determination. Cambridge University Press.
- Ayer, A. J. (1954). Freedom and Necessity. In Philosophical Essays (pp. 3-20). St. Martin’s Press.
- Blackburn, S. (2009). The Big Questions: Philosophy. Quercus.
- Brandon, R. N., & Carson, S. (1996). The Indeterministic Character of Evolutionary Theory: No “No Hidden Variables Proof” but No Room for Determinism Either. Philosophy of Science, 63, 315-317. https://doi.org/10.1086/289915 https://www.jstor.org/stable/188099
- Britannica (2021). Determinism. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/determinism
- Eagle, A. (2021). Chance versus Randomness. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/chance-randomness/
- Earman, J. (1986). A Primer on Determinism. Reidel.
- Hobbes, T. (1999). Of Liberty and Necessity. In V. Chappell (ed.), Hobbes and Bramhall on Liberty and Necessity (pp. 15-42). Cambridge University Press.
- Hoefer, C. (2016). Causal Determinism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/determinism-causal/
- Laitinen, A., Sandis, C., & D’’Oro, G. (eds.) (2013). Reasons and Causes: Causalism and Anti-Causalism in the Philosophy of Action. Palgrave Macmillan.
- O’Connor, T., & Franklin, C. (2021). Free Will. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/freewill/
- Searle, J. (2001). Rationality in Action. Cambridge University Press.
- Smith, M. (1998). Reasons and Causes. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/reasons-and-causes/v-1
- Startup, R. (2021). The Theory of the Selfish Gene Applied to the Human Population. Advances in Anthropology, 11, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.4236/aa.2021.113012
- Talbert, Matthew. (2019) Moral Responsibility. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/moral-responsibility/
- Wallace, R. J. (1994). Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Harvard University Press.