Boredom as a Possible Point of Departure for Meditation: Silence, Attention and Access to Being in Pablo D’Ors
- 1 University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
Abstract
Boredom is a characteristic of today’s society. At the individual level and at the social level, the Western countries suffer from boredom. There are extrin sic and intrinsic causes that can lead to boredom. In general, the state of boredom is reached when there are no problems to solve, when the profession does not demand our actions, or when we feel disappointed in realizing that the achievements of life do not give us sustained satisfaction over time. Boredom, especially if it becomes chronic, can be considered a negative thing. But it can also have something positive. The silence, stillness and inaction that define boredom are also characteristics that define the initial state of the person before meditation. This study aims to reflect the possibility of getting out of boredom through meditation. We can abandon boredom if we start a path of personal growth through increasing attention and perception; coming out of ourselves, leaving our own reflections and thoughts, reaching personal emp tying and a voluntary impoverishment of our exteriority, which opens th e door to us to encounter with being.
- Alvira, R. (1999). Filosofía de la vida cotidiana. Madrid: Ediciones Rialp. (In Spanish)
- D’Ors, P. (2012). Biografía del silencio. Madrid: Siruela. (In Spanish) [(2020). Biografía del silencio. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg]. (In Spanish)
- D’Ors, P. (2014). Entrevista a Pablo D’Ors, Biografía del silencio. (In Spanish) https://www.rtve.es/play/videos/para-todos-la-2/para-todos-2-entrevista-pablo-dors-biografia-del-silencio/2565414
- D’Ors, P. (2020). Entrevista a Pablo D’Ors. Charlas con alma. (In Spanish) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_13pW0tSqds
- D’Ors, P. (2021). Entrevista a Pablo D’Ors. Ethic. (In Spanish) https://ethic.es/entrevistas/pablo-dors-espiritualidad-pandemia
- Encyclopedia of Philosophy, IEP (2021). Boredom: A History of Western Philosophical Perspectives. https://iep.utm.edu/boredom
- Heidegger, M. (2007). Los conceptos fundamentales de la metafísica: Mundo, finitud, soledad. Madrid: Alianza.
- Lesmes González, D. (2009). Uno se aburre: Heidegger y la filosofía del tedio. Bajo Palabra. Revista de Filosofía, 4, 167-172. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3176154
- Márquez Romero, M. á. (2021). La filosofía y el aburrimiento: Idilios y desengaños. Trabajo Fin de Máster, Universidad de Sevilla. https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/105772
- Pascal, B. (2018). Pensamientos. Madrid: Tecnos.
- Ros Velasco, J. (2018). El aburrimiento como presión selectiva en Hans Blumenberg (p. 13). Tesis doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/46061
- Russell, B. (2020). La conquista de la felicidad. Madrid: Debolsillo.
- Schopenhauer, A. (2009a). El mundo como voluntad y representación I. Madrid: Trotta.
- Schopenhauer, A. (2009b). El mundo como voluntad y representación II. Madrid: Trotta.
- Schopenhauer, A. (2014). Parerga y Paralipómena I. Madrid: Trotta.
- Seneca (2013). Sobre la brevedad de la vida, el ocio y la felicidad. Barcelona: Acantilado.
- Svendsen, L. (2005). A Philosophy of Boredom, John Irons trans. Madrid: Reaktion Books.