The Confusion of the Symbol and That Which Is Symbolised: Religion, the Nation State, Politics and Society
- 1 College of Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
Abstract
The extent of confusion between symbols and that which is symbolised is examined across five institutional spheres. Religion is the institution most marked by confusion of this type; indeed in some respects the symbolic mess age of religion may be the extent of the substantive reality. On the oth er hand, the very existence of the nation state may be judged to depend upon the exercise of the human imagination; hence providing a source of instability which may lead to the excesses of nationalism. In regard to social status , the main problematical element is a certain circularity: it is necessary to get people to exhibit differences in behaviour which are then used to justify or constitute the status differences themselves. In politics , the symbolism of left and right threatens to strangle creative thinking, while in education the tendency on all sides to orient towards public systems of measurement and gradi ng u ndermines the claim that what is really important is pupil and stude nt learning. A social cost is being paid for the failure to recognise and, where possible, address the issues identified.
- Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities. Verso.
- Barker, C. (2004). Cultural Capital. In The Sage Dictionary of Cultural Studies (p. 37). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221280.n47
- Becker, H., Geer, B., & Hughes, E. C. (2017). Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203786635
- Boaz, D. (2008). The Politics of Freedom: Taking on the Left, the Right, and Threats to Our Liberties. Cato Institute.
- Bourdieu, P. (2002). The Forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755679.ch15
- Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. Sage Publications.
- Editors of the Encyclopaedia Britannica (2020). Eucharist: Christianity. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Eucharist
- Elgie, R. (2018). The Election of Emmanuel Macron and the New French Party System: A Return to the éternel Marais? Modern & Contemporary France, 26, 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639489.2017.1408062
- Fine, G. A. (1994). The Social Construction of Style: Thorstein Veblen’s “The Theory of the Leisure Class” as Contested Text. The Sociological Quarterly, 35, 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1994.tb01739.x
- Fowler, J. (1997). Hinduism Beliefs & Practices. Sussex Academic Press.
- Gauchet, M. (1996). Right and Left. In P. Nora, & L. D. Kritzman (Eds.), Realms of Memory: The Construction of the French Past, Volume 1. Conflicts and Divisions (pp. 242- 245). Columbia University Press.
- Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism (pp. 6-7). Cornell University Press.
- Giddens, A. (2007). Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Polity Press.
- Giddens, A. (2008). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Polity Press.
- Giddens, A. (2010). The Third Way and Its Critics: Sequel to “The Third Way” Paperback. Polity Press.
- Gilbert, P. (2018). The Philosophy of Nationalism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429496011
- Jensen, L. (2016). The Roots of Nationalism: National Identity Formation in Early Modern Europe, 1600-1815. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462981072