What Science Cannot Do: The Question Concerning Science and Heidegger
- 1 Faculty of Philosophy, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Abstract
This paper revisits Heidegger’s views on science and examines the relationship between science and thinking. Science, dominated by metaphysical subject-object thinking, understands beings (Seiende) as an object while forgetting the Being (Sein), and for Heidegger, this lack of understanding of Being is the lynchpin to his perception of modern science. This paper re-examines Heidegger’s challenge and concludes that while science ignores Being, Heidegger’s assessment of science is not a critique of science per se, but rather a critique of the danger the scientific way of thinking poses to our life world. It suggests that our unrestricted use of scientific thinking makes the meaning of Being in our own lifeworld become lost. What Heidegger implies is not that “science does not think,” but that human beings who living in the metaphysical and scientifical thinking do not think.
- Belgrano, M. (2021). World and Paradigm in Heidegger and Kuhn. Franciscanum, 63, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21500/01201468.4716
- Dreyfus, H. (2006). Heidegger on the Connection between Nihilism, Art, Technology, and Politics. In C. B. Guignon (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger (pp. 345-372). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521821363.014
- Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Blackwell Publishers .
- Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Harper & Row.
- Heidegger, M. (1985). History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena. Indiana University Press.
- Heidegger, M. (1991). Nietzsche Volume IV: Nihilism. HarperOne.
- Heidegger, M. (1992). Parmenides. Indiana University Press.
- Heidegger, M. (1993). Basic Writings. Harperone.
- Heidegger, M. (2000). Votrage und Aufsatze. Vittorio Klostermann.
- Heidegger, M. (2018). The Question Concerning the Thing: On Kant’s Doctrine of the Transcendental Principles. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001
- Milner, J.-C. (1995). L’oeuvre claire. Lacan, la science, la philosophie. Le Seuil.
- Patrick, H. A. (2012). Carnap and Heidegger. In G. Trish (Ed.), Heidegger on Science (pp: 113-130). State University of New York Press.
- Rado, R. (2012). Does Science Think? Filozofski vestnik, 33, 77-93.
- Wendland, A. J. (2018). Heidegger vs. Kuhn: Does Science Think? In A. J. Wendland, C. Merwin, & C. Hadjioannou (Eds.), Heidegger on Technology (pp. 282-298). Routledge.