How Did the Universe Come to Exist and Where Did We Come from? Two Versions: Who Has It Right, Science or Christianity?
- 1 PB Psychological Services, St Albert, Canada
Abstract
Dissension persists between proponents of mainstream scientific thinking (Science) and those of Christianity (Theology), regarding their respective cosmologies. The objective of this paper is to propose a uniting principle, which will accommodate the tenets of both camps while removing controversy. The explanation of our cosmological and biological origins asserted by Science is anchored on observation and measurement. They maintain that our entire universe began from a primeval substance, which expanded to comprise its present-day form. On the other hand, centered on a faith-based adherence to the Christian bible, Theology affirms that God created everything in the cosmos. Because of its scientific complexity , however, a very large proportion of the masses cannot be expected to have a full understanding of Science’s explanation. In addition, there is a lack of empirical justification for their claimed “ proven theory ” . Theology, claiming the ultimate power of a loving spiritual Deity uses readily available scripture to substantiate its supernatural argument. With a basis in observable and countable reality on the one hand and on the other, in an organized godly belief system, Science and Theology can coexist as authentic and independent schools of thought with their respective portals open to qualified scholars and practitioners. In an amicable atmosphere instead of in one of rivalry and vituperation, each group can claim equality with and mutual respect from the other, enriching rather than demeaning two major areas of human endeavour.
- Castelvecchi, D. (2019). How Fast Is the Universe Expanding? Cosmologists Just Got More Confused. Hotly Anticipated Technique Fails to Resolve Disagreement over Speed of Cosmic Expansion—For Now. Nature, 571, 458-459. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02198-z
- Ekeberg, B. (2019). Cosmology Has Some Big Problems. Observations. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/cosmology-has-some-big-problems/
- Greshko, M., & National Geographic Staff (2017). Origins of the Universe 101. National Geographic Society. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/origins-of-the-universe
- Hawking, S. (1996). The Beginning of Time. Libquotes. https://libquotes.com/stephen-hawking/quote/lbv0v0j
- Kaplan, M. (2011). Archaeopteryx No Longer First Bird. Nature, 443. https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2011.443
- Shu, F. H. (2021). Cosmology. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/cosmology-astronomy
- Steinhardt, P. J. (2011). The Inflation Debate: Is the Theory at the Heart of Modern Cosmology Deeply Flawed? The Inflation Debate: Cosmology. Scientific American, 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0411-36
- The National Aeronautics and Space (NASA) (n.d.). Understanding the Evolution of Life in the Universe, Universe 101: Our Universe. The National Aeronautics and Space. https://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_life.html
- The National Center for Science Education (NCSE) (2008). Botanical Society of America. Statement on Evolution. https://ncse.com/media/voices/botanical-society-america
- Thomas, N. (2021). Darwin’s Many Doubts. Evolution News & Science Today Today. https://evolutionnews.org/2021/11/darwins-many-doubts/
- Xu, X., You, H., Du, K., & Han, F. (2011). An Archaeopteryx-Like Theropod from China and the Origin of Avialae. Nature, 475, 465-470. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10288