The “End of History” and the “Last Man” in Europe—The Contemporary Rise of Illiberalism
- 1 Department of Social Studies, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
Abstract
The concept of the “End of History” was originally developed by G. W. F. Hegel in the Phenomenology of the spirit in 1806 (Hegel, 2018). The concept can be closely related to a utopia, the completion of the work of philosophers, and the creation of a perfect framework of the finished system of ideas. Hegel had a lot of influence on Western philosophy with the development of this idea and on Marx, who obviously thought of history in dialectic terms. However, he developed the idea of “communism”, which would have been a state of humankind very similar to the concept of Hegel, with no class differences and no opiates of the people—and no place for further development (Marx & Engels, 2002). The “End of History” is based on this theoretical viewpoint that mankind has reached the final and most advanced form of societal development. However, the theorists and their intellectual followers both have to realize a painful way that the phenomenon can only be attained preliminarily. It proves to be a utopia.
- Beneš, E. (1916). Détruisez l’Autriche-Hongrie: Le martyre des Tchécho-Slovaques à travers l’histoire. Delagrave.
- Brzezinski, Z. (2001). The Geostrategic Triad: Living with China, Europe, and Russia (Vol. 23, No. 1). Center for Strategic & International Studies.
- Dale, E. M. (2014). Hegel, the End of History, and the Future. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107477711
- Fukuyama, F. (2006). The End of History and the Last Man. Simon and Schuster.
- Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. Macmillan.
- Halecki, O., & Halecki, O. (1952). Borderlands of Western Civilization: A History of East Central Europe (p. 7). Ronald Press Company.
- Hegel, G. W. F. (2018). Hegel: The Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford University Press.
- Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2002). The Communist Manifesto. Penguin.
- Máté-Tóth, A. (2019). Freiheit und Populismus. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25485-8
- Mudde, C, & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001
- Nietzsche, F. W. (2005). Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for Everyone and Nobody. Oxford University Press.
- Shaw, T. (2014). The “Last Man” Problem: Nietzsche and Weber on Political Attitudes to Suffering. In M. Knoll, & B. Stocker (Eds.), Nietzsche as Political Philosopher (pp. 345-380). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110359459.345
- Wallace, W. (1999). The Sharing of Sovereignty: The European Paradox. Political Studies, 47, 503-521. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00214
- Weber, M. (2002). The Protestant Ethic and the “Spirit” of Capitalism and Other Writings. Penguin Classics.