Development of Indo-European Hypotheses in Europe of the 19th-20th Centuries: From Aryan Ideas to the Renaissance of the Trypillian Culture
- 1 Department of Religious Studies of H. S. Scovoroda Philosophy Institute, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract
Hypotheses about a mysterious ancient civilization were born in the eighteenth century among European intellectuals, who vied with each other to report on the high culture of India, supposedly having a universal mission. The impetus for this was the national consciousness awakened in European society back in the Renaissance. The European scientific community of the nineteenth century formed the term “Aryans”, which was originally used as a neutral term to define the Indo-European language family, as well as ancient culture, and was synonymous with the term “Indo-Europeans”. The ethnonym “Arius” itself comes from the oldest Indian and Iranian sacred texts and meant “noble” or “luminous”. However, starting at the end of the 19th century, it began to be used to define “racial theories”, and later a specific nation, justifying their “natural right” to rule over the so-called “unelected” peoples. In the first half of the twentieth century, the term “Aryans” was used by the leaders of the Third Reich, which led to its final distortion, and the synonymous meaning “Indo-Europeans” was barely used. Since the second half of the twentieth century, the development of Indo-European/Aryan theories has taken on a new meaning, largely due to archaeological science. After the fall of the Iron Curtain scientists gained access to the civilizations of the Black Sea steppes and the Dnieper region of Ukraine, which was significantly limited during the communist years. At the end of the twentieth century, scientists received archaeological data not previously taken into account in Indo-European studies. Thus, with the development of research, the archaeological culture of Trypillia from the territory of Ukraine acquires the significance of the Indo-European or Proto-Indo-European culture, which, to a large extent, expands the idea of the ancient history of Europe. The paper considers the swastika symbol as a stereotypical marker of the Indo-European/ Aryan logos and its ideological inversion in the first half of the 20th century. Indo-European hypotheses underwent their significant formation and development precisely in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. This particular period is historiographically well-covered in terms of research and therefore is included in this paper. At the same time, the paper also highlights new and promising methods of Indo-European issues researching that have already begun to be implemented in the twenty-first century. Since the formation and development of various Indo-European hypotheses in historical retrospect and an interconnected form is still an under-researched topic and has not been comprehensively considered in special scientific works, the author aims to carry out the above-mentioned research work. The study of the Indo-European hypotheses development covers the topics of the linguistic origin, worldview, local and racial hypotheses, examines Indo-European searches in the research of Ukrainian scholars, and reveals the subtopic of Trypillian culture and its specific symbolism, which corresponds to the above research topic.
- Alpatov, V. M. (1991). Istoriya odnogo mifa: Marr i marrizm [The Story of One Myth: Marr and Marrism]. Nauka. (In Russian)
- Anthony, D. W. (2007). The Horse, the Wheel and the Language. Princeton University Press.
- Anthony, D. W. (2010). The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7sjpn
- Bagdasarov, R. V. (2005). The Mysticism of the Fiery Cross (3rd ed.). Veche Publishing.
- Bayi, J. S. (2003). Letters about Plato’s Atlantis and about the Ancient History of Asia. Atlantis and Hyperborea: Myths and Facts. FAIR-Press.
- Chamberlain, H. S. (2012). The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century (Vol. 1). Russian World Publishing House.
- Danylenko, V. N. (1969). Neolithic of Ukraine. In N. Dumka (Ed.), The Ancient History of South-Eastern Europe. Scientific Thought Publishing.
- Dobrosotsky, I. A. (1998). Secrets of Life (Gods and People). NGO “Modek”.
- Encyclopedia of Tripillian Civilization (2004). Sovereign Undertaking Knizhkov Chamber of Ukraine Named after Ivan Fedorov. National Commission of Ukraine on the Rights of UNESCO. Corporation “Industrial Branch of Donbass”; ZAT “Petroimpeks”. Ukrpoligrafmedia Publishing. https://archive.org/details/tryptsyv01
- Field, G. G. (1981). Evangelist of Race: The Germanic Vision of Houston Stewart Chamberlain. Columbia University Press.
- Figueira, D. M. (2002). Aryans, Jews, Brahmins: Theorizing Authority through Myths of Identity. State University of New York Press.
- Gasparov, B. (2012). Beyond Pure Reason: Ferdinand De Saussure’s Philosophy of Language and Its Early Romantic Antecedents. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/columbia/9780231157803.001.0001
- Gobineau, A. (1853-1855). Essai sur l’inégalité des races humaines. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k650519/f3.image
- Golan, A. (1991). Myth and Symbol: Symbolism in Prehistoric Religions. Jerusalem.
- Hornung, B. V. (1963). From the Prehistory of the Formation of the Common Slavic Language Unity. (In Russian) http://www.library.univ.kiev.ua/ukr/elcat/new/detail.php3?doc_id=213216
- Hrushevskyi, M. S. (1991). History of Ukraine-Russia (Vol. 1). Scientific Thought Publishing.