An Exploration and Analysis of Conceptual Engineering in the Philosophy of Language
- 1 College of Foreign Languages, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
Abstract
The main research methodology of the philosophy of language is conceptual investigation and its main task is to clarify or disambiguate concepts. Undoubtedly, this is a basic consensus in the circles of the philosophy of language. However, with the development of the discipline, people have realized that the research of the philosophy of language should not stop at conceptual clarification or disambiguation, but it should tinker with or replace concepts and when necessary, create new concepts. These are the new developments in the philosophy of language. Central to these developments is the research of conceptual engineering. What exactly is conceptual engineering? What practical values does it have? Centering around these questions, this paper presents an exploration of conceptual engineering itself with a view of revealing its essence and analyzing its practical implications. The basic tasks of conceptual engineering include conceptual design, implementation and evaluation. The practical value of conceptual engineering is that it pushes conceptual clarification or disambiguation toward conceptual construction.
- Austin, J. L. (1957). A Plea for Excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 57, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/57.1.1
- Blackburn, S. (1999). Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
- Blackmore, S. (2010). The Third Replicator. New York Times. https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/22/the-third-replicator/
- Brandom, R. (2002). Tales of the Mighty Dead . Harvard University Press.
- Burgess, A., & Plunkett, D. (2013a). Conceptual Ethics I. Philosophy Compass, 8, 1091-1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12086
- Burgess, A., & Plunkett, D. (2013b). Conceptual Ethics II. Philosophy Compass, 8 , 1102-1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12085
- Cappelen, H. (2018). Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814719.001.0001
- Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and Necessity. University of Chicago Press.
- Carnap, R. (1950). The Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press.
- Chalmers, D. (2011). Verbal Disputes. Philosophical Review , 120 , 515-566. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-1334478
- Chen, J. (2003). Philosophy of Language. Peking University Press.
- Creath, R. (1991). Dear Carnap, Dear Van. University of California Press.
- Dawkins, R. (2006). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.
- Du, S. (2003). On Associative Characteristics of Homophone Switching in Discursive Interactions. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, No. 9, 12-14.
- Du, S. (2005a). The Essence of Meme from a Gene Perspective. Journal of Ningbo University, No. 4, 74-78.
- Du, S. (2005b). A Journey to American Languages. China Social Sciences Press.
- Du, S. (2012). Meme and Teme in English Grammar Teaching. Education and Teaching Forum, No. 20, 55-57.
- Eklund, M. (2015). Intuitions, Conceptual Engineering, and Conceptual Fixed Points. In C. Daly (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods (pp. 363-385). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137344557_15
- Gupta, A. (2015). Definitions. In E. N. Zalta, U. Nodelman, C. Allen, & J. Perry (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . Stanford University.