Virtual versus Artificial Intelligence
- 1 Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Retired), Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
Abstract
Many evidences suggest that: 1) Our sensory organs give a poor representation of the world around us; 2) Free will (FW) is an illusion of the mind, so, we cannot decide our actions at will; moreover, we become aware of our actions late; 3) We cannot objectively/scientifically define what is our consciousness for an obvious conflict of interest (“The hard question of consciousness”). Yet, it is interesting to note that the activity of our mind is compatible with proactive cognitive processes, i.e. with individual “Autopoiesis”. “The Bignetti Model” (TBM) explains that Cognition (i.e. “Autopoiesis”) is a thermodynamically-driven computational process that elaborates the so-called “voluntary” reactions against perturbing stimuli. This is a statistical process carried out by a physiological dual state of the mind, i.e. the Unconscious mind (UM) (with a biochemical/biophysical language) and the Conscious Mind (CM) (with a spoken language). UM and CM guide the individual mind in Cognition (Autopoiesis), like in a virtual game in which UM and CM play the roles of the Avatar and of the Player, respectively. In summary, our mind behaves like a Virtual Intelligence (VI) that adjusts the expectations to match reality, though in a virtual context. According to TBM, VI is committed to achieving individual “Autopoiesis” by means of the ability of problem solving, on the one hand, by collecting the relevant data and, on the other one, by improving scientific and technological tools. The most promising tool with a wide application is Artificial Intelligence (AI). The credit to AI is so much inflating that someone might fear that it might substitute for VI in creative and intellectual works. However, this hypothesis is scientifically unattainable. In fact, we know that both UM and CM play a crucial role in cognition, but we don’t know how they reciprocally translate their languages to get this target (see point 3, above); so that VI cannot artificially reproduce UM and CM in AI. While VI is a dual state of the mind that is genetically encoded to carry out Cognition (Autopoiesis) by itself, AI is a product elaborated by VI and not a clone of it. We confirmed this conclusion by interviewing Chatgpt on the meaning of TBM. Though TBM is exhaustively reported in the current, scientific literature, AI could not define it, by itself. AI could approach the solution by fitting a sort of template, only with the aid of the clues and the relative “Data” given by us.
- Aimi, A., Martuzzi, F., & Bignetti, E. (2018). Rational Curves Modeling Psychophysical Tests Data: A Computational Approach Compatible with TBM Cognitive Model. Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences (FJMS), 107, 81-108. https://doi.org/10.17654/ms107010081
- Aman, W., & Stachowicz-Stanusch, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Business . Age Publishing Inc.
- Ananya (2023). Algorithms Are Making Important Decisions. What Could Possibly Go Wrong? Scientific American .
- Baars, B. J., & Gage, N. (2019). Fundamentals of Cognitive Neuroscience . Academic Press.
- Bignetti, E. (1994). Vie sensoriali e soft-brain. Annals of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Parma , 14 , 65-95.
- Bignetti, E. (2001). Dissacrazione della Coscienza . II Valico ediz.
- Bignetti, E. (2003a). Cervello e mente: Ovvero casualità e determinismo. Annals of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Parma , 23 , 69-78.
- Bignetti, E. (2003b). Autopoiesi della mente . Speaker al ciclo di seminari di “Neuronica”, Dip. Fisica di Palermo.
- Bignetti, E. (2004). Consciousness Can Learn but Cannot Decide. Annals of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Parma , 24 , 31-52.
- Bignetti, E. (2010). Free Will Is the Illusionary By-Product of Self-Perception. In The 4th International Nonlinear Science Conference of “The Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Science” (pp. 1-10). The Soc for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Science.
- Bignetti, E. (2013). Ego and Free Will: A Virtual Binomial Apt for Cognition. In Invited Speaker Proc. of Neuroplasticity and Cognitive Modifiability (pp. 20-25). Medimond.
- Bignetti, E. (2014). The Functional Role of Free-Will Illusion in Cognition: “The Bignetti Model”. Cognitive Systems Research, 31, 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2014.04.001
- Bignetti, E. (2015). From Brain to Mind: A Plain Route from Neurobiology to Psychology. Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, 1, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.17140/pcsoj-1-103
- Bignetti, E. (2017). Which Is Necessary for Cognition, “Free Will” or “Free Will Illusion”? Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, 3, 116-122. https://doi.org/10.17140/pcsoj-3-133
- Bignetti, E. (2018). New Insights into “The Bignetti Model” from Classic and Quantum Mechanics Perspectives. Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, 4, 24-35. https://doi.org/10.17140/pcsoj-4-140