Causation as Agency in Modal Meinongianism
- 1 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Abstract
In this paper, I am going to explore an alternative explanation of causation in Graham Priest’s modal meinongianism. Priest proposes an understanding of causation, which is either too confusing, or against the metaphysical core of modal meinongianism. In his proposals, causation is discussed in the context of defining purely fictional and abstract objects, by using a counterfactual approach. In this case, causation is understood as an existence-entailing relation. I will argue that such an account of causation proves ineffective. Instead, I will give another interpretation for causation, which is based on Peter Menzies and Huw Price’s version of agency theory of causation. My interest in studying such a particular subject is to find an answer which is to be used in a further research. The end result of my work will be the fact that causation as agency can, at best, be useful in understanding intentional acts, but not suitable for explaining what it means for a particular object to causally interact with us.
- Ahmed, A. (2007). Agency and Causation. In H. Price, & R. Corry (Eds.), Causation, Physics and the Constitution of Reality: Russell’s Republic Revisited . Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0006
- Berto, F. (2011). Modal Meinongianism and Fiction: The Best of Three Worlds. Philosophical Studies , 152 , 313-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9479-2
- Berto, F. (2012). Existence as a Real Property: The Ontology of Meinongianism . Synthese Library, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4207-9
- Ciprotti, N. (2014). On Modal Meinongianism. In M. Antonelli, & M. David (Eds.), Logical, Ontological, and Historical Contributions to the Philosophy of Alexius Meinong (pp. 1-36). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110351187.1
- Menzies, P., & Price, H. (1993). Causation as a Secondary Quality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 44 , 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/44.2.187
- Perszyk, K. J. (1993). Nonexistent Objects: Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy (Nihoff International Philosophy Series 49). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8214-8
- Priest, G. (2005). Towards Non-Being: The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality . Oxford University Press.
- Quine, W. V. (1948). On What There Is. The Review of Metaphysics , 2, 21-38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20123117
- Routley, R. (2018). Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond . Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78793-0