A Dialogue on Dynamics: Mulla Sadra’s Essential Movement and Presentist-Fragmentalism in Quantum Gravity
- 1 College of Science, Department of Physics, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq
Abstract
The nature of consciousness and the soul remains one of philosophy’s oldest enigmas and science’s most formidable challenges. This paper explores the distinctive philosophy of Mulla Sadra (c. 1571 CE-1640 CE) regarding consciousness, rooting it in his revolutionary doctrine of Essential Movement (al-Harakat al-Jawhariyyah). Unlike previous philosophers who largely adhered to a static understanding of substance, Sadra posited a continuous, inherent transformation of all material beings, culminating in the emergence of the soul as a higher, more perfected mode of existence. This paper will first delineate Sadra’s unique metaphysical framework for consciousness, emphasizing its dynamic and emergent nature. Subsequently, it will compare Sadra’s views with those of pre-Sadraean Islamic philosophers, particularly Avicenna, highlighting the crucial shifts his doctrine introduced. Finally, it will engage Sadra’s ideas with prominent contemporary scientific approaches to consciousness, such as Integrated Information Theory and Presentist-Fragmentalism in quantum gravity, exploring points of conceptual resonance and inherent divergence, including potential, albeit speculative, mathematical mappings. This interdisciplinary analysis underscores the enduring relevance of Sadra’s thought in enriching modern discussions on the mind-body problem and the fundamental fabric of reality.
- Abdulaziz, D. (2010). Mulla Sadra and the Mind—Body Problem: A Critica l Assessment of Sadra’s Approach to the Dichotomy of Soul and Spirit (pp. 1-56). http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/506/
- Cortês, M., & Smolin, L. (2014). Quantum Energetic Causal Sets. Physic al Review D, 90, Article ID: 044035. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.90.044035
- Eshkevari, M. F. (2013) Mulla Sadra’s Theory of Substantial Motion (pp. 25-43). http://wab.uib.no.
- Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. (1986). Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems. Physical Review D, 34, 470-491. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.34.470
- Jones, B. J. P., & Seidel, O. H. (2024). Collapse of Neutrino Wave Functions under Penrose Gravitational Reduction. Physical Review D, 110, Article ID: 016026. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.016026
- Le Poisevin, R. (2011). The Experience and Perception of Time. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition) http://plato.stanford.edu/archieves/summer2019/entries/time-experience/
- Marchesini, P. (2018). The End of Time or Time Reborn? Henri Bergson and the Metaphysics of Time in Contemporary Cosmology. Philosophy and Cosmology, 21, 140-152. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/21/15
- Mctaggart, J. E. (1908). I.—The Unreality of Time. Mind, XVII, 457-474. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/xvii.4.457
- Merriam, P. (2022a) A Theory of the Big Bang in McTaggart Time. Axioma thes , 32 , 685-696.
- Merriam, P. (2022b). Presentist Fragmentalism and Quantum Mechanics. F oundations of Physics , 52 , 1-8.
- Merriam, P., & Habeeb, M. A. Z. (2024). The Presentist Fragmentalist T heory of Quantum Gravity . PhilPapers. Referencing Recent Works on FCQG.
- Rovelli, C. (2013). Covariant Loop Gravity. In G. Calcagni, L. Papantonopoulos, G. Siopsis, & N. Tsamis (Eds.), Quantum Gravity and Quantum Cosmology (pp. 57-66). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33036-0_3
- Rovelli, C. (2019). Neither Presentism Nor Eternalism. Foundations of Physics, 49, 1325-1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-019-00312-9
- Shirazi, M. S. (2008). Spiritual Psychology : The Fourth Intellectual J ourney in Transcendent Philosophy — Volumes VIII & IX of the Asfar . Icas Press Ltd.
- Smolin, L., & Verde, C. (2021). The Quantum Mechanics of Present . arXiv: 2104.09945. http://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.09945