Aristotle’s Rhetoric presents a number of internal inconsistencies, many of which stem from its nature as a compilation of lecture notes developed over several decades. As a result, the terminology employed across different sections is not always consistent, and the work appears to address multiple audiences, ranging from students of dialectic to aspiring orators. Certain parts of the text—such as the treatment of emotion in Book II and much of Book III—likely originated as independent lectures and were later incorporated into the treatise without full conceptual integration. These structural and conceptual inconsistencies are reflected in specific topics throughout the work and are particularly evident in Aristotle’s treatment of pathos , or emotional appeal. This paper identifies and analyzes four major inconsistencies in Aristotle’s account of pathos : 1) The status of pathos as a persuasive proof: In the opening of the Rhetoric , Aristotle appears to downplay pathos as a legitimate pistis (proof), yet later chapters—particularly in Book II—assign it a central role in rhetorical persuasion. 2) The relationship between pathos and the enthymeme: Although Aristotle associates the enthymeme strictly with logos , he does not clearly indicate whether emotional appeals can be integrated into this deductive structure, leaving the relationship between pathos and rational reasoning unresolved and ambiguous. 3) Incomplete application of the tripartite analysis of emotion: Aristotle proposes that each emotion should be examined through a triadic framework—comprising the subject’s state of mind, the object of the emotion, and the contextual circumstances. However, in his treatment of several specific emotions, this structure is applied only partially, and in one instance, omitted altogether. 4) Audience character and rhetorical strategy: Chapters 12 - 17 of Book II, which outline the emotional and behavioral traits of various demographic groups, create interpretive uncertainty by overlapping concerns traditionally associated with both pathos and ēthos .
Aristotle (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation (J. Barnes, Ed., Vol. 2). Princeton University Press.
Aristotle (2007). On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Aristotle (2011). Problems, Volume II: Books 20-38. Rhetoric to Alexander (R. Mayhew & D. C. Mirhady, Eds. & Trans.; Loeb Classical Library No. 317). Harvard University Press.
Barwick, K. (1922). Die Gliederung der rhetorischen Techne und die horazische Epistula ad Pisones. Hermes, 57, 1-62.
Barwick, K. (1966). Die “Rhetorik ad Alexandrum” und Anaximenes, Alkidamas, Isokrates, Aristoteles und die Theodekteia. Philologus, 110, 212-245.
Braet, A. C. (1992). Ethos, Pathos and Logos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: A Re-Examination. Argumentation, 6, 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00154696
Brandes, P. D. (1968). The Composition and Preservation of Aristotle’s Rhetoric . Speech Monographs, 35, 482-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637756809375598
Brandes, P. D. (1989). A History of Aristotle ’ s Rhetoric, with a Bibliography of Early Printi ngs . The Scarecrow Press.
Brunschwig, J. (1994). Rhétorique et Dialectique Rhétprique et Topiques. In D. J. Furley, & A. Nehamas (Eds.), Aristotle ’ s “ Rhetoric ” : Philosophical Essays (pp. 57-96). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400872879-004
Burnyeat, M. F. (1994). Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Logic of Persuasion. In D. J. Furley, & A. Nehamas (Eds.), Aristotle ’ s “ Rhetoric ” : Philosophical Essays (pp. 3-56). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400872879-003
Campbell, G. (1990). The Philosophy of Rhetoric (L. F. Bitzer, Ed.). Southern Illinois University Press.
Chamberlain, C. (1984). From Haunts to Character: The Meaning of Ethos and Its Relation to Ethics. Helios, 11, 97-108.
Cicero (1939). Brutus (H. M. Hubbell, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Cicero (1942). De Oratore (E. W. Sutton & H. Rackham, Trans.; Loeb Classical Library Nos. 348). Harvard University Press.
Cicero (1949). On Invention. The Best Kind of Orator. Topics (H. M. Hubbell, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Cicero [Pseudo] (1954). Rhetorica ad Herennium (H. Caplan, Trans.; Loeb Classical Library No. 403). Harvard University Press.
Conley, T. M. (1982). Pathe and Pisteis: Aristotle, Rhet. II.2-11. Hermes, 110, 300-315.
Conley, T. M. (1984). The Enthymeme in Perspective. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 168-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383687
Cope, E. M. (1867). An introduction to Aristotle ’ s Rhetoric . Macmillan and Co.
Cope, E. M. (1877). The Rhetoric of Aristotle with a Commentary (J. E. Sandys, Ed.; Vols. I-III). Cambridge University Press.
Copeland, R. (2019). Enthymeme. New Literary History, 50, 369-373. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2019.0027
Copeland, R. (2021). Emotion and the History of Rhetoric in the Middle Ages . Oxford University Press.
Corbett, E. P. J., & Connors, R. J. (1999). Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Stud ent (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Dow, J. (2015). Passions and Persuasion in Aristotle ’ s Rhetoric . Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716266.001.0001
Dufour, M. (1931). Introduction. In M. Dufour, & A. Wartelle (Eds. & Trans.), Aristote, Rhétorique (p. 20). Les Belles Lettres.
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (1975). Aristotle on Emotion . Barnes & Noble.
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (1994). Quintilian 62.8-9: Ēthos and Pathos and the Ancient Tradition. In W. W. Fortenbaugh, & D. C. Mirhady (Eds.), Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle (pp. 183-191). Transaction Publishers.
Frede, D. (1996). Mixed Feelings in Aristotle’s Rhetoric. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle ’ s Rhetoric (pp. 258-285). University of California Press.
Gill, C. (1984). The Ēthos/Pathos Distinction in Rhetorical and Literary Criticism. The Classical Quarterly, 34, 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800029396
Green, L. D. (2006). Pathos. In T. O. Sloane (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Rhetoric (pp. 574-588). Oxford University Press.
Grimaldi, W. (1972). Studies in the Philosophy of Aristotle ’ s Rhetoric . Franz Steiner Verlag.
Grimaldi, W. (1980). Aristotle, “ Rhetoric ” I: A Commentary . Fordham University Press.
Grimaldi, W. (1988). Aristotle, Rhetoric II: A commentary . Fordham University Press.
Gross, D. M., & Kemmann, A. (Eds.) (2005). Heidegger and Rhetoric. State University of New York Press.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1981). A History of Greek Philosophy , Volume VI: Aristotle — An Encounter . Cambridge University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2001). Being and Time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Blackwell.
Isocrates (2000a). Against the Sophists (D. C. Mirhady & Y. L. Too, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Isocrates (2000b). Panathenaicus (G. Norlin, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Kennedy, G. A. (1971). The Art of Persuasion in Greece . Princeton University Press.
Kennedy, G. A. (1994). A New History of Classical Rheto ric . Princeton University Press.
Kennedy, G. A. (1996). The Composition and Influence of Aristotle’s Rhetoric. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle ’ s Rhetoric (pp. 416-424). University of California Press.
Kennedy, G. A. (1999). Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times . The University of North Carolina Press.
Kennedy, G. A. (2007). On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Konstan, D. (2006). The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature . University of Toronto Press.
Kroll, W. (1940). Rhetorik. In Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft (Suppl. VII, cols. 1039-1138). J. B. Metzler.
Leff, M. C. (1982). The Material of the Art in the Latin Handbooks of the Fourth Century A.D. In B. Vickers (Ed.), Rhetoric Revalued (pp. 71-78). Center for Medieval & Early Renaissance Studies
Lossau, M. J. (1981). Pros krisin tina politiken : Untersuchungen zur aristotelischen Rhetorik . Otto Harrassowitz.
Lunsford, A., & Ede, L. (1984). On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric. In R. J. Connors, L. Ede, & A. Lunsford (Eds.), Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse (pp. 37-49). Southern Illinois University Press.
Marrou, H.-I. (1965). Histoire de l ’ éducation dans l ’ antiquité (6th ed.). Seuil.
Meyer, M. (2005). Some Remarks on the Foundation of Literary Rhetoric. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature, 32, 85-90.
Mirhady, D. C. (2007). Chapter Three. Aristotle’s Enthymeme, Thymos, and Plato. In D. C. Mirhady (Ed.), Influences on Peripatetic Rhetoric (pp. 53-64). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004156685.i-286.13
Preus, A. (2017). Philosophy and Rhetoric in Western Greece: Focus on Empedocles and Gorgias. In H. L. Reid, D. Tanasi, & S. Kimbell (Eds.), Politics and Performance in Western Greece: Essays on the Hellenic Heritage of Sicily and Southern Italy (Vol. 2, pp. 193-204). Parnassos Press-Fonte Aretusa. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbj7grj.14
Quintilian (1920). Institutio oratoria (H. E. Butler, Trans.; Vols. 1-4). Harvard University Press.
Rapp, C. (2002). Aristoteles: Rhetorik . Übersetzung , Einleitung und Kommentar (Vols. 1-2). Akademie Verlag.
Rico, C. (2024). Logos in Ancient Greek: A Philological Inquiry. In C. Rico, & J. Paniello (Eds.), From Logos to Person (Vol. 5, pp. 17-43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72878-5_2
Robinson, D. N. (1989). Aristotle ’ s Psychology . Columbia University Press.
Smith, B. (1927). Thrasymachus: A Pioneer Rhetorician. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 13, 278-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335632709379694
Solmsen, F. (1929). Die Entwicklung der aristotelischen Logik und Rhetorik . Weidmann.
Solmsen, F. (1938). Aristotle and Cicero on the Orator’s Playing Upon the Feelings. Classical Philology, 33, 390-404. https://doi.org/10.1086/362176
Solmsen, F. (1941). The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric. The American Journal of Philology, 62, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/291223
Sprague, R. K. (1972). The Older Sophists . University of South Carolina Press.
Sprute, J. (1975). Topos und Enthymem in der Aristotelischen Rhetorik. Hermes, 103, 68-90.
Sprute, J. (1981). Aristoteles’ Theorie rhetorischer Argumentation. Gymnasium, 88, 254-273.
Sprute, J. (1982). Die Enthymemtheorie der aristotelischen Rhetorik ( Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Philologisch-Historische Klasse, 3. Folge , Nr. 124) . Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Stavru, A. (2020). Pathos, Physiognomy and Ekphrasis from Aristotle to the Second Sophistic. In J. C. Johnson, & A. Stavru (Eds.), Visualizing the Invisible with the Human Body : Physiognomy and Ekphrasis in the Ancient World (pp. 143-160). De Gruyter.
Süss, W. (1910). Ēthos : Studien zur älteren griechischen Rhetorik . B. G. Teubner.
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1987). Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Argumentation, 1, 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00136779
Walker, J. (1994). The Body of Persuasion: A Theory of the Enthymeme. College English, 56, 46-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/378216
Walker, J. (2000). Rhetoric and Poetics in Antiquity . Oxford University Press.
Webb, R. (1997). Imagination and the Arousal of the Emotions in Greco-Roman Rhetoric. In S. Braund, & C. Gill (Eds.), The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature (pp. 112-127). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511586163.009
Wells, S. (2006). Logos. In T. O. Sloane (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Rhetoric (pp. 475-486). Oxford University Press.
Wisse, J. (1989). Ēthos and Pathos : From Aristotle to Cicero . A.M. Hakkert.
Woerther, F. (2007a). Les passions rhétoriques chez Aristote et Al-Farabi: Formes discursives et mécanismes d’induction. Organon (Polish Academy of the Sciences), 36, 55-74.
Woerther, F. (2007b). L ’ éthos aristotélicien : Genèse d ’ une notion rhétorique . Vrin.
Woods, M. C. (2015). Performing Dido. In K. Donavin, & S. Stodola (Eds.), Public Declamations (pp. 253-265). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1484/m.disput-eb.5.107458