The “Other” and the “Self”: The Modern Interpretation of Chinese Philosophy from a Global Philosophical Perspective—A Review of The Methodology of Chinese Philosophy : How to Engage with “ Chinese Philosophy ”
- 1 School of Philosophy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Abstract
This book addresses the contested “legitimacy” of Chinese philosophy, arguing the debate is misdirected. The author, Peng Guoxiang, contends that the field’s priority is to establish its own “subjectivity”—an autonomous paradigm grounded in Chinese culture and discourse. The work outlines key methodologies for this task, emphasizing textual mastery, Western philosophical literacy, and a global comparative perspective. It analyzes exemplary 20th-century scholars to advocate for a dual approach: integrating Western concepts into Chinese frameworks and using Chinese thought to engage Western philosophical questions. Moving beyond disciplinary boundaries, the book connects the future of Chinese philosophy research to the integrative study of intellectual history, proposing a path for its renewal and global contribution.
- Du, W. M., An, L. Z., Liu, G. X. et al. (2018). The Global Horizon and Future Directions of Chinese Philosophy Studies. Philosophical Trends, No. 8 , 5-16.
- Gao, H. B. (2021). Tracing the Origins and Self-Consciousness of Methodology among Modern Chinese Philosophers . Journ al of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 36 , 167-173+208.
- Li, W. W. (2004). Morphology, Problems, and Trends: Reflections on the Methodology of 20th-Century Chinese Philosophy Research. Academic Monthly, No. 9 , 95-103.
- Nussbaum, M. (1994). The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton University Press.
- Yang, L. H., & Zhao, J. G. (2015). Contemporary Paths for the Reconstruction of Chinese Philosophy: A Dialogue Based on Ren Ontology. Philosophical Trends, No. 5 , 29-35.