Machine Cognition and Prior Knowledge: A Study Based on Computer Vision Models
- 1 School of Philosophy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Abstract
By reviewing the evolution and applications of computer‑vision models, this paper systematically analyzes the beneficial impact of prior knowledge on machine cognition—namely, improved data efficiency, enhanced robustness, and increased interpretability. Vision models exploit a rich set of a priori image properties—spatial locality, translational invariance, and hierarchical organization—by embedding these priors, explicitly or implicitly, into network architecture, preprocessing pipelines, and regularization terms. Such incorporation enables models to achieve high accuracy and clearer internal representations even when training datasets are scarce. In parallel, we examine the cognitive constraints and potential risks of relying on a priori knowledge. Overly strong priors can restrict the expressive range of machine cognition, introduce subjectivity, and pose difficulties in formally representing the acquired knowledge. This dual perspective underscores both the promise and the pitfalls of integrating prior knowledge into visual‑perception systems.
- Anderson, J. R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition . Harvard University Press.
- Cameron, J. B. (2023). From Deep Learning to Rational Machines: What the History of Philosophy Can Teach Us about the Future of Artificial Intelligence . Oxford University Press.
- Clark, A. (2013). Whatever Next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x12000477
- Colelough, B. C., & Regli, W. (2025). Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review . https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05435
- Dong, C. Y. (2023). The Nature of AI and Its Limits in the Light of the Opacity of Machine Cognition. Social Sciences in China , 5, 148.
- Elgammal, A., Liu, B. C., Elhoseiny, M., & Mazzone, M. (2017). CAN: Creative Adversarial Networks, Generating “Art” by Learning about Styles and Deviating from Style Norms . https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07068
- Friston, K. (2010). The Free-Energy Principle: A Unified Brain Theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
- Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning . MIT Press.
- Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason . Cambridge University Press.
- Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017). Building Machines That Learn and Think Like People. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e253. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x16001837
- LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep Learning. Nature, 521, 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
- LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998). Gradient-based Learning Applied to Document Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86, 2278-2324. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791
- Marcus, G. (2018). Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal . https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00631
- Miao, K., Gokul, A., Singh, R., Petryk, S. et al. (2022). Prior Knowledge-Guided Attention in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers . https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.03745
- Pearl, J. (2009). Causality . Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511803161
- Piaget, J. (1970). Structuralism . Basic Books.
- Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science . MIT Press.