Structural Constraints, Perspectival Arrows, and the Metaphysics of Entropy and Time
- 1 School of Social and Human Studies, Atlantic International University, Honolulu, HI, USA
Abstract
This paper develops an expanded structural-perspectival framework that reconciles the time-symmetry of fundamental physical laws with the asymmetric phenomenology of temporal experience and quantum retrocausality. Building on Penrose’s geometric interpretation of low-entropy boundary conditions and Price’s analysis of time-symmetry in entanglement, the argument situates entropy as a global geometric gradient within a block-universe ontology. The apparent “flow” of time is reinterpreted as a cognitive artifact arising from coarse-grained access to globally constrained structure. The paper introduces entity-agnostic realism, a metaphysical stance in which theoretical entities function as modal-structural roles rather than intrinsic objects, thereby avoiding ontological inflation while preserving realism. Retrocausal correlations are explained through orthogonality relations and global consistency constraints in the space of possible configurations, resolving paradoxes such as bilking without invoking backward-in-time causation. The framework integrates epistemic limitations, biological filtering mechanisms, and modal coherence to show how embedded observers generate unidirectional temporal phenomenology from a static spacetime manifold. The result is a unified metaphysics of entropy and time that harmonizes determinism with retrocausality, structural asymmetry with experiential directionality, and global constraint with local uniqueness.
- Albert, D. (2000). Time and Chance. Harvard University Press.
- Callender, C. (2017). What Makes Time Special? Oxford University Press.
- Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the Universe: A Review of the ‘Orch OR’ Theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11, 39-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002
- Healey, R. (2017). The Quan tum Revolution in Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
- Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (2007). Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press.
- Lewis, P. J. (2016). Quantum Ontology: A Guide to the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press.
- Maudlin, T. (2007). The Metaphysics within Physics . Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218219.001.0001
- Penrose, R. (1989). The Emperor ’ s New Mind. Oxford University Press.
- Penrose, R. (2004). The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. Knopf.
- Penrose, R. (2016). On the Gravitization of Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 46, 135-153.
- Price, H. (1996). Time ’ s Arrow & Archimedes ’ Point . Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195117981.001.0001
- Price, H. (2012). Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How the Quantum World Says “Maybe”? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 43, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.12.003
- Price, H., & Wharton, K. (2015). Disentangling the Quantum World. Entropy, 17, 7752-7767. https://doi.org/10.3390/e17117752
- Skow, B. (2015). Objective Becoming . Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713272.001.0001
- Worrall, J. (1989). Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds? Dialectica, 43, 99-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x
- Zeh, H. D. (2007). The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time. Springer.