Identifying the Intellectual Virtues in a Demon World
- 1 Department of Philosophy, Lakehead University, Orillia Campus, Orillia, Canada
Abstract
Within contemporary epistemology, notions of intellectual virtue have come to fulfill a prominent role in attempts to provide an account of knowledge. Notions of such virtue can vary, and one particular aspect of this variance concerns how to construe the relationship between the intellectual virtues and particular epistemic ends. The goal of this article is to defend an instrumental connection between the intellectual virtues and the epistemic end of true belief. One type of skeptical argument that attempts to sever this connection, a Cartesian Demon argument, is considered. This Cartesian Demon argument will be summarized, as well as three responses to it. The claim that truth-conduciveness is a tenable criterion for identifying the intellectual virtues is then defended. It is acknowledged that the possibility of a Cartesian Demon does initiate scepticism, but that this scepticism is directed toward identifying specific intellectual virtues and not toward the instrumental connection between intellectual virtue and true belief.
- Axtell, G. (1996). Epistemic-virtue talk: The reemergence of American axiology? The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 10, 172-198.
- Axtell, G. (1997). Recent work on virtue epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly, 34, 1-26.
- Axtell, G. (1998). The role of the intellectual virtues in the reunification of epistemology. The Monist, 81, 488-508.
- Axtell, G. (2001). Epistemic luck in light of the virtues. In A. Fairweather, & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Virtue epistemology: Essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility (pp. 158-177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bloomfield, P. (2000). Virtue epistemology and the epistemology of virtue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60, 23-43. doi:10.2307/2653426
- Fairweather, A. (2001). Epistemic motivation. In A. Fair-weather, & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Virtue epistemology: Essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility (pp.63-81). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
- Garcia, J. L. A. (2003). Practical reason and its virtues. In M. DePaul, & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology (pp. 81-107). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Goldman, A. I. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Greco, J. (1992). Virtue epistemology. In J. Dancy, & E. Sosa (Eds.), A companion to epistemology (pp. 520-522). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
- Greco, J. (2000). Two kinds of intellectual virtue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60, 179-184. doi:10.2307/2653438
- Kvanvig, J. (1992). The intellectual virtues and the life of the mind: on the place of the virtues in epistemology. Savage: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
- Lehrer, K. (2001). The virtue of knowledge. In A. Fairweather, & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Virtue epistemology: Essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility (pp. 200-213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Montmarquet, J. A. (1987). Epistemic virtue. Mind, 96, 482-497. doi:10.1093/mind/XCVI.384.482
- Montmarquet, J. A. (1993). Epistemic virtue and doxastic responsibility. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
- Montmarquet, J. A. (2000). An “internalist” conception of epistemic virtue. In G. Axtell (Ed.), Knowledge, belief, and character: Readings in virtue epistemology (pp. 135-148). New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.