Justification and False Belief: Gettier’s First Point
- 1 Retired, Berg en Dal, The Netherlands
Abstract
Appearances notwithstanding, in this paper we do not discuss the Gettier problem. The question at issue is whether one can be justified in believing a false proposition. So, what is at stake is the relation between justified belief and falseness. In his famous paper, Gettier presupposes explicitly that one can be justified in believing a false proposition (Gettier’s “first point”). He makes essential use of this point in arguing for his well-known Gettier cases. I will prove that this point, in Gettier’s robust reading, is untenable since it leads to incompatible or contradictory consequences. It is only in a much weaker sense than we find in Gettier’s paper that it seems possible to be justified in believing a false proposition.
- Audi, R. (2000). The Old Skepticism, the New Foundationalism, and Naturalized Epistemology. In E. Sosa, & J. Kim (Eds.), Epistemology (pp. 325-335). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
- Gettier, E. (1963). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis, 23, 121-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/23.6.121
- Kitcher, P. (1992). The Naturalists Return. The Philosophical Review, 101, 53-115. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185044
- Kripke, S. A. (2011). Philosophical Troubles. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Lehrer, K. (2000). Theory of Knowledge (2nd ed.). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
- Macarthur, D. (2004). Naturalism and Skepticism. In M. de Caro, & D. Macarthur (Eds.), Naturalism in Question (pp. 106-125). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Shope, R. K. (1983). The Analysis of Knowing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Stroud, B. (2011). Engagement and Metaphysical Dissatisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199764969.001.0001
- Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.