The mind when posing the question “what is consciousness?” (i.e. “The Hard Problem of Consciousness”, THPOC) will encounter an unsurmountable conflict of interest. The hope that by investigating the “neural correlates to consciousness” (NCCs) one might come to a “scientific (conceptual)” defini tion of consciousness is then paradoxical. In fact, the investigation of NCCs might unveil only “operational” (functional) properties of the mind. Nevertheless, the pieces of information deriving from these investigations seem to be striking. To this respect, there is a growing evidence of a dual-state activity in mind, corresponding to the activities of a conscious (explicit) mind (C) and an unconscious (implicit) mind (U), respectively; moreover, C and U do not share any conceptual connection with psych o analytic Conscious and Unconscious. In detail, C is the domain where thoughts (as well as images and music) can be managed; instead, U exhibits a biophysical/biochemical activity. In order to communicate with each other, a transduction of one language into the other must reciprocally occur; it is notable that the investigation of NCCs leads to the conclusion that it is right that transduction process accounts for the unsurmountable question about THPOC. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the dual state activity in mind stands on a probabilistic-deterministic mechanism; this functional property of the mind is incompatible with the existence of free-will (FW) but not with C’s FW illusion. In summary in the current literature, there is a unique cognitive model that is compatible with all these evidences, i.e. “The Bignetti Model” (TBM).
KeywordsThe Hard Problem of ConsciousnessThe Conflict of InterestConscious and Unconscious MindFree WillThe Bignetti Model
Aimi, A., Martuzzi, F., & Bignetti, E. (2018). Rational Curves Modelling Psychophysical Tests Data: A Computational Approach Compatible with TBM Cognitive Model. Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 1, 81-108. https://doi.org/10.17654/MS107010081
Baars, B. J. (1988). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baars, B., & Gage, N. (2012). Fundamentals of Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Bargh, J. (1999). The Unbearable Automaticity of Being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462
Bignetti, E. (1994). Vie sensoriali e soft-brain. In Annals of Veterinary Medicine Faculty (Vol. XIV, pp. 65-95). Parma: University of Parma.
Bignetti, E. (2001). Dissacrazione della coscienza. Firenze: Il Valico Edizioni.
Bignetti, E. (2003). Cervello e mente: Ovvero casualita’e determinismo. In Annals of Veterinary Medicine Faculty (Volume XXIII, pp. 69-78). Parma: University of Parma.
Bignetti, E. (2004). Consciousness Can Learn But Cannot Decide. In Annals of Veterinary Medicine Faculty (Vol. XXIV, pp. 31-52). Parma: University of Parma.
Bignetti, E. (2010). Free Will Is the Illusionary By-Product of Self-Perception. In The 4th International Nonlinear Science Conference of “The Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Science”. Palermo: 15-17 March, INSC2010. https://doi.org/10.1037/e534482010-001
Bignetti, E. (2013). Ego and Free Will: A Virtual Binomial Apt for Cognition. In Proceedings of Neural Plasticity and Cognitive Modifiability (pp. 19-22). Jerusalem: Medimond Intl. Proc., Monduzzi Ed.
Bignetti, E. (2014). The Functional Role of Free-Will Illusion in Cognition: The Bignetti Model. Cognitive Systems Research, 31-32, 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2014.04.001
Bignetti, E. (2015). From Brain to Mind: A Plain Route from Neurobiology to Psychology. Psychology and Cognitive Sciences—Open Journal, 1, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-1-103
Bignetti, E. (2017). Which Is Necessary for Cognition, Free Will or Free Will Illusion? Psychology and Cognitive Sciences—Open Journal, 3, 116-122. https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-3-133
Bignetti, E. (2019). Il Binomio “Coscienza-Libero Arbitrio” è Un’Illusione Vincente. Amazon.it. https://www.amazon.it/BINOMIO-COSCIENZA-LIBERO-ARBITRIO-UNILLUSIONE-VINCENTE-ebook/dp/B07NJ285V7
Bignetti, E., Martuzzi, F., & Tartabini, A. (2016). A Psychophysical Approach to Test: The Bignetti Model. Psychology and Cognitive Sciences—Open Journal, 3, 24-35. https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-3-121
Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 200-219. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311105.003.0001
Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The Conscious Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D. J. (2000). Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Empirical and Conceptual Questions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1998). Consciousness and Neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex, 375, 121-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/8.2.97
Crick, F., & Koch, C. (2003). A Framework for Consciousness. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 119. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0203-119
Dennett, D. C. (1988). Quining Qualia. In A. J. Marcel, & E. Bisiach (Eds.), Consciousness in Contemporary Science (pp. 42-47). New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
Dennett, D. C. (2001). Are We Explaining Consciousness Yet? Cognition, 79, 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00130-X
Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think Different: The Merits of Unconscious Thought in Preference Development and Decision Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 586-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.586
Edelman, G. M. (1989). The Remembered Present: A Biological Theory of Consciousness. New York: Basic Books.
Ellenberger, H. F. (1970). The Discovery of the Unconscious: The History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry (pp. 209-210). New York: Basic Books.
Freud, S. (1901). Psychopathology of Everyday Life (Translated by Bell, A.). London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Freud, S. (1904). L’interpretazione dei sogni (edizione integrale del 2014). Roma: Newton Compton.
Gerstner, W., Kistler, W. M., Naud, R., & Paninski, L. (2014). Neuronal Dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gonzales, V. C., Lassiter, G. D., Bellezza, F. S., & Lindberg, M. J. (2008). “Save Angels Perhaps”: A Critical Examination of and the Deliberation-without-Attention Effect. Review of General Psychology, 12, 282-296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013134
Gordon-Roth, J. (2019). Locke on Personal Identity. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-personal-identity/
Hibberd, F. J. (2003). What Is Scientific Definition? The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 40, 29-52.
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The Cortical Organization of Speech Processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2113
Koch, C. (1999). Biophysics of Computation. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M., & Tononi, G. (2016). Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Progress and Problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17, 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.22
Libet, B. (1982). Brain Stimulation in the Study of Neuronal Functions for Conscious Sensory Experiences. Human Neurobiology, 1, 235-242.
Libet, B. (1983). Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (Readiness Potential): The Unconscious Initiation of a Freely Voluntary Act. Brain, 106, 623-642. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/106.3.623
Libet, B. (2005). Mind Time: The Temporal Factor in Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Locke, J. (1690). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Columbia MD, USA: GreatBookPrices.
Nichols, S. (2011). Experimental Philosophy and the Problem of Free Will. Science, 331, 1401-1403. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192931
O’Connor, T. (2013). Free Will. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/freewill/
Schultz, W. (2015). Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to Data. Neuronal Rewards and Decision Signals, 95, 853-951. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00023.2014
Shepherd, J. (2012). Free Will and Consciousness: Experimental Studies. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 915-927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.004
Spivey, M. (2008). The Continuity of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2008). The Neural Correlates of Consciousness: An Update. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.004
Vicente, A., & Manrique, F. M. (2011). Inner Speech: Nature and Functions. Philosophy Compass, 6, 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00369.x
Von Hartmann, E. (2014). Philosophie des Unbewussten. San Bernadino, CA: Ulan Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Myshlenieirech: Psykhologicheskie Issledovaniya. Moscow and Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe Sotsialno-Ekonomicheskoe Izdatel’stvo. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilson, T. (2003). Knowing When to Ask: Introspection and the Adaptive Unconscious. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 131-140.