William Paley’s classic version of the Teleological Argument contends that just as a watch is ordered for a purpose and we rightfully conclude that it had a creator who ordered it, the universe is also ordered in many ways and for a variety of purposes, so we should similarly conclude that it had a creator, God, who ordered it. This paper contends that Paley committed the fallacy of equivocation when he lumped various types of order together as if they had no differences. The watch’s operations are an example of Intentional Order—order created intentionally by a conscious agent for a specific purpose. The universe, on the other hand, until it had conscious and purposeful beings such as human beings, had exhibited only Ramseyian Order, Purposeless Order, and Functional Order. These three types of order can be explained by science in naturalistic terms, and therefore it is superfluous to appeal to a conscious Creator-God, let alone a supernatural one. Additionally, the paper asserts that the best scientific evidence indicates that the universe has always been and still is primarily disordered, and further argues that the natural laws, contrary to popular belief, are not ordered. Moreover, the order that is present is riddled with design flaws. As such, our universe is inconsistent with what one would expect from an Intelligent Designer/God. Therefore both Paley’s analogical argument and all standard versions of the Teleological Argument, which rely on the order present in the universe to argue for the existence of God, fail.
KeywordsTeleological ArgumentArgument from DesignPaleyWatch AnalogyOrderRamsey TheoryNatural LawsScientific LawsProblems with the Teleological ArgumentDisordered UniverseTypes of Order
Aquinas, T. (1274). Summa Theologica. In M. Rea, & L. Pojman (Eds.), Philosophy of Re- ligion (7th ed., pp. 164-166). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
Aschwanden, M. et al. (2018). Order Out of Randomness: Self-Organization Processes in Astrophysics. Space Science Reviews, 214, 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0489-2
Atkins, P. (2018). Conjuring the Universe: The Origins of the Laws of Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
Firestone, R. S. (2014). Naturalistic vs Supernatural Explanations: Charting a Course away from a Belief in God by Utilizing Inference to the Best Explanation. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4, 281-302. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2014.43034
Firestone, R. S. (2019). Oversimplification in Philosophy. Open Journal of Philosophy, 9, 396-427. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2019.93025
Graham, R., & Spencer, J. (1990). Ramsey Theory. Scientific American, 263, 112-117.
Green, D. G., Sadedin, S., & Leishman, T. G. (2008). Self-Organization. In S. E. Jorgensen, & B. D. Fath (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Ecology (pp. 3195-3203). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00696-0
Helmenstine, A. M. (2019). What Is a Scientific or Natural Law?
Heylighen, F. (1999) The Science of Self-Organization and Adaptivity. In L.D. Kiel (Ed.), Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. Oxford, UK: Eolss Publishers Co.
Intentional Order
Functional Order
Self-Organization
Hume, D. (1779). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. New York: Barnes and Noble Publishing, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00044084
Jogalekar, A. (2014). Should Physicists Stop Looking for Fundamental Laws?
Johnson, B. C. (1983). The Atheist Debater’s Handbook. Amherst, MA, New York: Pro- metheus Books.
Kant, I. (1783). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. In L. Pojman (Ed.), Classics of Philosophy, Volume II: Modern and Contemporary (pp. 774-820). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kierkegaard, S. (1846). Concluding Unscientific Postscript. In R. Solomon (Ed.), Existen- tialism (pp. 3-33, 2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kitcher, P. (2010). Living with Darwin: Evolution, Design, and the Future of Faith. In P. Peterson, W. Hasker, B. Reichenbach, & D. Basinger (Eds.), Philosophy of Religion (4th ed., pp. 542-550). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lightman, A. (2014). The Accidental Universe: The World You Thought You Knew. New York: Vintage Books.
Mackie, J. L. (1980). The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. New York: Ox- ford University Press.
Murray, M. (2010). The Atheist’s Primer. Buffalo, NY: Broadview Press.
Nietzsche, F. (1887). Beyond Good and Evil. In Basic Writings of Nietzsche (Kaufman, W., Trans., pp. 179-435). New York: The Modern Library/Random House, 1992.
Oppy, G. (2006). Arguing about Gods. New York: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498978
Paley, W. (1809). Natural Theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity (12th ed.). London: Printed for J. Faulder. http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/search-results?freetext=Paley
Paul, G. (2009). Theodicy’s Problem: A Statistical Look at the Holocaust of the Children, and the Implications of Natural Evil for the Free Will and Best of All Worlds Hypo- theses. Philosophy & Theology, 19, 125-149. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtheol2007191/27
Plantinga, A. (1974). God, Freedom, and Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdsman Pub- lishing Company.
Pojman, L. (2001). Philosophy of Religion. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
Rowe, W. (2007). Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Scriven, M. (1966). Primary Philosophy. In L. Pojman (Ed.), Philosophy of Religion, an Anthology (pp. 344-352, 4th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Shanks, N., & Karsai, I. (2005). Self-Organization and the Origin of Complexity. In M. Young, & T. Edis (Eds.), Why Intelligent Design Fails (pp. 85-106). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Stenger, V. (2008). God: The Failed Hypothesis—How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Stewart, I. (1992). Does Chaos Rule the Cosmos? Discover Magazine.
Swinburne, R. (2002). Arguments from Design. In M. Rea, & L. Pojman (Eds.), Philoso- phy of Religion (pp. 207-210, 7th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
Ussery, D. (2005). Darwin’s Transparent Box: The Biochemical Evidence for Evolution. In M. Young, & T. Edis (Eds.), Why Intelligent Design Fails (pp. 48-57). New Bruns- wick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2020.101012
185 Open Journal of Philosophy
R. S. Firestone
Wikipedia (2019). Scientific Laws.
Winegard, T. (2019). The Mosquito: A Human History of Our Deadliest Predator. New York: Dutton. (Penguin Random House)
Yanofsky, N. (2017). Chaos Makes the Multiverse Unnecessary. Nautilus, Issue 49, June 22, 2017. http://nautil.us/issue/49/the-absurd/chaos-makes-the-multiverse-unnecessary