Subsoil interventions in the Netherlands, such as gas and oil extraction, thermal energy extraction or CO 2 -storage, cause tensions. Planning leads to local resistance, debate and often delay or cancelling of initiatives. The central characteristics of this planning are the main cause. As the transition to sustainable energy asks for more interventions in the subsoil, these tensions get problematic, and hinder the transition. In this article , we investigate this problematic nature of central public planning of subsoil interventions in the Netherlands. We do this by using a network management perspective and local acceptance theory and researching two cases. We conclude that a more prominent role of local actors, using localism and soft power, is crucial. With this article , we want to contribute to national and international discussions about the planning and governance of subsoil initiatives and strengthening of local involvement in these.
Briffault, R. (2018). The Challenge of the New Preemption. Stanford Law Review, 70, 1995.
Bulman-Pozen, J., & Gerken, H. K. (2008). Uncooperative Federalism. Yale Law Journal, 118, 1258-1307. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1545
Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. I. The Rise of the Network Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Daamen, D., Terwel, B., & ter Mors, E. (2010). Wat weten en vinden Barendrechters van het CO2 opslag plan en van de voorlichting en besluitvorming over dit plan? Resultaten van een enquête in mei 2010 onder ruim 800 inwoners. Leiden. (In Dutch)
Davidson, N. M. (2019). The Dilemma of Localism in an Era of Polarization. Yale Law Journal, 128, 954-1001.
De Bruijn, H., & ten Heuvelhof, E. (2007). Management in netwerken: Over veranderen in een multi-actorcontext (2nd Revised ed.). (In Dutch)
De Bruijn, H., ten Heuvelhof, E., & in’t Veld, R. (2002). Procesmanagement, over procesontwerp en besluitvorming (2nd Revised ed.). (In Dutch)
De Vries, A., van Est, R., & van Waes, A. (2013). Samen winnen. Verbreding van schaliegasdiscussie en handvatten voor besluitvorming. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut. (In Dutch)
Dirven, J., Rotmans, J., & Verkaik, A. P. (2002). Samenleving in Transitie: Een vernieuwend gezichtspunt; Ministerie LNV, Den Haag, ICIS, Maastricht, Innovatie Netwerk Groene Ruimte en Agrocluster, Den Haag. (In Dutch)
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Frug, G. E. (1999). City Making: Building Communities without Walls. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. (2005). The Rise of “New” Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Had Governance Eclipsed Government? Political Studies, 53, 477-496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00540.x
Kamer, T. (2015). Behandeling Rapport Onderzoeksraad voor Veiligheid over het Gasgebouw. TK 58-20-1. Den Haag.
Koppejan, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2004). Managing Uncertainties in Networks. A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. London: Routledge.
Mansfield, H. C., & Winthrop, D. (2000). Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic Governance. New York: Free Press.
Metze, T., & Turnhout, E. (2014). What the Frack? Politiserende deliberatie in de besluitvorming over schaliegas. Bestuurskunde, 23, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.5553/Bk/092733872014023002003
Nye, J. S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The Annals of the American Academy, 616, 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699
Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Paukovic, M., Brunsting, S., & de Best-Waldhober, M. (2011). The Dutch General Public’s Opinion on CCS and Energy Transition: Development in Awareness, Knowledge, Beliefs and Opinions Related to Information and Media Coverage (pp. 1-189). CATO2-WP5.3-D02a.
Pierre, J. (2000). Debating Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rekenkamer, A. (2020). Resultaten verantwoordingsonderzoek 2019 Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat (XIII) Rapport bij het jaarverslag. Den Haag. (In Dutch)
Rotmans, J., Loorbach, D., & van der Brugge, R. (2005). Transitiemanagement en duurzame ontwikkeling; Co-evolutionaire sturing in het licht van complexiteit. Beleidswetenschap, 19, 3-23. (In Dutch)
Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295457.001.0001
Stake, R. (2013). Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York: Guilford.
Susskind, L., & Field, P. (1996). Dealing with an Angry Public: The Mutual Gains Approach to Resolving Disputes.
Tellis, W. M. (1997). Introduction to Case Study. The Qualitative Report, 3, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/1997.2024
Ter Mors, E. (2009). Dealing with Information about Complex Issues. The Role of Source Perception. Leiden: Kurt Lewin Instituut.
van Dunné, J. M. (2014). Een koperen jubileum van de nieuwe Mijnbouwwet. Tijdschrift Voor Gezondheidsschade Milieuschade en Aansprakelijkheidsrecht, 28, 174-193. (In Dutch) http://hdl.handle.net/1765/101542
van Os, H. (2018). Modular Evaluation Method Subsurface Activities: Analyzing the Spatial Coordination of the Subsurface in the Netherlands from a Social Acceptance Perspective. Groningen: University of Groningen.
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Innovation: An Introduction to the Concept. Energy Policy, 35, 2683-2691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research, Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Applied Social Research Methods Series Vol. 5, London: SAGE Publications.
Zima, L. A., & Vriezen, G. A. (2011). Amendment of the Mining Act. A Nice Late Summer or a New Spring? Wijziging van de Mijnbouwwet. Mooie nazomer of nieuwe lente? (In Dutch)