General Analysis of the Impact of US Humanitarian Response to Iraq’s Instability
- 1 Department of International Relations, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
- 2 Department of International Relations, Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey
- 3 Department of International Relations, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey
- 4 Independent Researcher, Istanbul, Turkey
Abstract
The issue of humanitarian intervention is widely discussed in the field of international relations. While the issue of humanitarian intervention is necessary for hegemonic states, it is defined as the justification for “occupation” for states with more idealistic discourses. According to critics of “humanitarian intervention”, the clearest example of the criticized occupation issue is the US-Iraq war. The concept of humanitarian intervention has been discussed in the international system for a long time, and its status under international law still remains unclear. The USA carried out a military operation in Iraq under the pretext of humanitarian intervention, because of this, the Saddam regime was overthrown, furthermore, had other devastating consequences. The USA has labeled some states including Iraq as “rogue” states that “brutalize their own people and squander their natural resources for the personal gain of their rulers ” . In this study, the humanitarian intervention by the USA, which has a negative impact on Iraq, is examined.
- Arenliu, A., Weine, S. M., & Gormez, V. (2021). Conducting Research on Building Psychosocial Support for Refugee Families in a Humanitarian Emergency. Conflict Health, 15, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00365-6
- Bellamy, A. (2005). Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse? The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2005.tb00499.x
- Boztas, A. (2011). Theoretical Analysis of Proactive Policies in Turkey’s Relations with Africa: Constructivist Theory, Critical Theory and International Community Theory. Dumlupinar University Journal of Social Sciences, No. 31, 139-140.
- Brezezinski, C. (2007). Second Chance. Inkilap Publications.
- Bull, H. (2000). International Relations: Section I. The Nature and Purpose of International. In A. Linklayer (Ed.), Typeset in Times (p. 12). Thomson Press.
- Demirel, N. (2013). The Question of Humanitarian Intervention and Legal Legitimacy in International Law. FSM Scientific Research, Journal of Human and Society, No. 1, 155-170.
- Erkmen, S. (2010). US Withdrawal from Iraq: The End of the Invasion in Iraq or the Beginning of the End? Middle East Analysis, 2, 10-13.
- Eyüboglu, A. (2014). Yasar Has Become a Muslim, He Deserves the Presidency! https://www.milliyet.com.tr/cadde/ali-eyuboglu/yasar-hidayete-erdi-baskanligi-hak-etti-1028504
- Friedman, G. (2014). America’s Secret Wars. Pegasus Publications.
- Hehir, A. (2008). Humanitarian Intervention after Kosovo Iraq, Darfur and the Record of Global Civil Society. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584105
- Jemirade, D. (2020). Humanitarian Intervention (HI) and the Responsibility to Protect (R2P): The United Nations and International Security. African Security Review, 30, 48-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2020.1847153
- Karabulut. A. (2014). Black Money: Illegal Financing Source of Terrorist Organizations and PKK Example, Iraq Field Survey. Bilgeoguz Publishing House.
- Korkmaz, T. (2013). From the Brutality of My Lai to the Torture of Abu Ghraib. https://www.yenisafak.com/yazarlar/tamer-korkmaz/irakta-sivil-oldurme-hurriyeti-8832
- Kücük, M. (2014). Understanding the “Constructivist Turn” in the Theory of International Relations. Ege University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relations. http://www.circassiancenter.com/cc-turkiye/CC-Daava/040_uluslarlarasiiliskilerdekuraminda.htm