A Survey of the History of Western Political Thought on Political Authority
- 1 Teaching and Research Department of Party History, Hunan Administration Institute, Changsha, China
- 2 Women Theory Teaching and Research Department, Hunan Administration Institute, Changsha, China
Abstract
In the non-political field, authority is a social relationship based on personal needs and a psychological mechanism realized by respect. This determines that authority is characterized by fragmentation and potential (Chen, 2021) . However, the inherent characteristics of authority are obviously disadvanta geous to the rulers who pursue the general obedience of their subjects. Therefore, in the political field, authority must be transformed into a universal and unified political authority. Max Weber believes that authority is the possibili ty that a group of people will obey certain or all orders (Webber, 1978: p . 212) . This also affected the academic research on political authority after the Second World War, which has never been divorced from Weber’s empirical research (for instance, Frank Furedi’s Authority : a Social Study and Richard Sennett’s Authority ). In fact, reviewing the history of Western political thought, we can find that there are many political thinkers who try to think about political authority from a normative point of view, including Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, John Stuart Mill , and so on, but their understanding of political authority and the means of legalizing political authority are different. This paper believes that Hobbes’ understanding of political authority is closer to its essential attribute and plays an important role in the history of Western political thought, so it is necessary to focus on it. Of course, due to the limitations of the times, Hobbes’ view of political authority also has some defects, so it has been questioned by thinkers of different schools of contemporar y thought. By examining Hobbes’ view of political authority, Yves Simon, the representative of Neo-Thomism, reconstructed the relationship between authority and liberty, and made a strong positive defense for political authority. Based on this, this paper has three purposes: first, by tracing back to the history of Western political thought, make a normative interpretation of political authority; second, to interpret the core meaning of Hobbes’ view of political authority; third, survey Yves Simon’s contemporary exposition of political authority.
- Arendt, H. (1961). Ch. 3. What Is Authority? In Between Pass and Future (pp. 91-141). The Viking Press.
- Chen, X. S. (2021). Political Authority: An Investigation Based on Western Political Thought and History. Academia Bimestris, 5, 112-119. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XHAI202105013.htm
- Duan, D. M. (2017). Authority as the Premise of Liberty—Thinking about Political Authority from a Normative Perspective. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), 4, 144-152. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FDDX201704017.htm
- Feinberg, J. (1989). The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Volume 3: Harm to Self. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195059239.001.0001
- Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. Andrew Crooke.
- Hobbes, T. (1996). On the Citizen. Cambridge University Press.
- Mommsen, T. (2005). The History of Rome (Vol. 1). Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.org./etext/10701
- Oakeshott, M. (2012). Lectures in the History of Political Thought. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Press.
- Simon, Y. R. (1948). Nature and Function of Authority: Under the Auspices of the Aristotelian Society of Marquette University. Marquette University Press.
- Simon, Y. R. (1980). A General Theory of Authority. University of Notre Dame Press.
- Simon, Y. R. (1993). Philosophy of Democratic Government. University of Notre Dame Press.
- Taminiaux, J. (2006). Ch. 8: Athens and Rome. In D. R. Villa (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt (pp. 165-177). Cambridge University Press.
- Taylor, C. (2003). The Malaises of Modernity. House of Anansi Press.
- Webber, M. (1978). Economy and Society (Vol. 1). University of California Press.
- Wu, Z. D. (2006). Hobbes and the Problem of “the Evil of Power” in Liberalism. Zhejiang Academic Journal, 3, 134-140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJXK200603018.htm
- Zhao, K. (2019). On Hobbes’ Concept of Right Reason. Social Sciences Abroad, 5, 116-123. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWSH201905013.htm