Design thinking has gained prominence as an innovative, human-centered methodology for addressing complex problems across disciplines. Despite its widespread application in fields such as business and education, its potential as a research tool in political science remains underexplored. This paper presents design thinking method as a robust qualitative research methodology suitable for examining comparative social and public policy, governance, and political systems, especially contested and value-laden social problems. By aligning the iterative, abductive processes of design thinking with the principles of pragmatism, this framework offers a novel approach to addressing the multifaceted empirical challenges in areas such as health policy, environmental governance, political campaigns, and evidence-based policymaking. Through a six-phase standardized framework and actionable templates, this manuscript demonstrates how design thinking enables researchers to generate insights that bridge theory and practice in political science.
KeywordsDesign Thinking MethodWicked ProblemsPragmatismAbductive ReasoningUser-Centered ApproachIterative FrameworkStakeholder EngagementTheory-Practice Gap
Almond, G. A., & Powell, G. B. (1996). Comparative Politics Today: A World View . HarperCollins.
Ansell, C. (2011). Pragmatist Governance: Reimagining Institutions and Democracy . Oxford University Press.
Australian Public Service Commission (APSC) (2007). Tackling Wicked Problems: A Public Policy Perspective . Commonwealth of Australia.
Biesta, G. J. J., & Burbules, N. C. (2003). Pragmatism and Educational Research . Rowman & Littlefield.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Creates New Alternatives for Business and Society . Harper Business.
Brown, V. A., Harris, J. A., & Russell, J. Y. (2010). Tackling Wicked Problems through the Transdisciplinary Imagination . Earthscan.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis . Sage.
Christensen, C. (2012). Calgary, Alberta: A Study in Waste Management . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315780236
Churchman, C. W. (1967). Wicked Problems. Management Science, 14, B141-B146.
Conklin, J. (2006). Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems . Wiley.
Cross, N. (2011). Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work . Bloomsbury.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry . Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Distance Education Accrediting Commission (DEAC) (2020). Report from the Accrediting Commission. February 24, 2020. https://www.deac.org/UploadedDocuments/Public-Notices/Accreditation-Actions/022420_AC_meeting_report.pdf
Dorst, K. (2011). The Core of “Design Thinking” and Its Application. Design Studies, 32, 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
Easton, D. (1953). The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science . Knopf.
EDSC Innovation Lab. (2019). Design Thinking and Rapid Impact Evaluation for Public Sector Innovation . OPSI Case Study Library. https://oecd-opsi.org/innovations/design-thinking-and-rapid-impact-evaluation-for-public-sector-innovation/
Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the Swamp: The Opportunity and Challenge of Reflexivity in Research Practice. Qualitative Research, 2, 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures . Basic Books.
Goodin, R. E., & Klingemann, H.-D. (1996). A New Handbook of Political Science . Oxford University Press.
Head, B. W. (2008). Wicked Problems in Public Policy. Public Policy, 3, 101-118.
Head, B. W. (2010). Reconsidering Evidence-Based Policy: Key Issues and Challenges. Policy and Society, 29, 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001
Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management. Administration & Society, 47, 711-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
Hwei, L. C. (2022). Beyond 2050: Reimagining Design Education in Singapore . Design Singapore Council Report.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking . Longmans, Green.
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research . Princeton University Press.
Kolko, J. (2010). Abductive Thinking and Sensemaking: The Drivers of Design Synthesis. Design Issues, 26, 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.15
Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the Tragedy of Super Wicked Problems: Constraining Our Future Selves to Ameliorate Global Climate Change. Policy Sciences, 45, 123-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
Lewis, J. M., McGann, M., & Blomkamp, E. (2019). When Design Meets Power: Design Thinking, Public Sector Innovation and the Politics of Policymaking. Policy & Politics, 48, 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319x15579230420081
Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 925-938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163
Liedtka, J., & Salzman, R. (2018). Applying Design Thinking to Public Service Delivery . https://www.businessofgovernment.org/report/applying-design-thinking-public-service-delivery
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry . Sage.
Lykketoft, K. (2016). MindLab : The Evolution of a Public Innovation Lab . The GovLab. https://blog.thegovlab.org/mindlab-the-evolution-of-a-public-innovation-lab
Mariani, I., Mortati, M., Rizzo, F., & Deserti, A. (2024). The Theoretical Background of Design Thinking for Public Sector Innovation. In I. Mariani, M. Mortati, F. Rizzo, & A. Deserti (Eds.), Design Thinking as a Strategic Approach to E-Participation : From Current Barriers to Opportunities (pp. 57-74). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72160-1_4
Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions: Theory, Cases, and Techniques . Wiley.
Peirce, C. S. (1934). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce . Harvard University Press.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01405730
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action . Basic Books.
Termeer, C. J., Dewulf, A., & Biesbroek, G. R. (2015). Transformational Change: Governance Interventions for Climate Change Adaptation from a Continuous Change Perspective. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58, 997-1014.
Van Bueren, E. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2003). Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug017
Van De Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for Theory and Practice. Academy of Management Review, 31, 802-821. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527385
Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings. Public Administration Review, 68, 334-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x