Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Timing of Presidential Scandals: The Role of Economics, Divided Government and the Media
Department of Political Science, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA
Department of Political Science, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA
- 1 Department of Political Science, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA
- 2 Department of Political Science, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA
Open Journal of Political Science·Volume 06 (2015)·Pages 83–94·Published 26 November 2015·DOI10.4236/ojps.2016.61008
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
The political consequences of presidential scandals have received a great deal of attention in both the media and scholarly work. The role of the media and the impact of presidential approval are some the most common topics. In this study, we develop models that predict the type of political environment that is most likely to produce a scandal. The findings link the occurrence of presidential scandals with the performance of the economy and the presence of divided government. A strong economy creates favorable conditions for scandals. Divided government is shown to be an almost necessary condition for a presidential scandal to occur.
KeywordsPresidential ScandalDivided Government
- Abramowitz, A. I. (1985). Economic Conditions, Presidential Popularity, and Voting Behavior in Midterm Congressional Elections. The Journal of Politics, 47, 31-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131064
- Beck, N. (1991). Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential Approval. In J. A. Stimson (Ed.), Political Analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 51-88.), Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pan/3.1.51
- Brace, P., & Hinckley, B. (1991). The Structure of Presidential Approval: Constraints Within and Across Presidencies. The Journal of Politics, 53, 993-1017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131864
- Conley, R. S. (2003). The Presidency, Congress, and Divided Government: A Postwar Assessment. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
- Fackler, T., & Lin, T. (1995). Political Corruption and Presidential Election, 1929-1992. Journal of Politics, 57, 971-993. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2960398
- Gerhardt, M. J. (2000). The Impeachment and Acquittal of President William Jefferson Clinton. In J. Mark (Ed.), The Clinton Scandal and the Future of American Government (pp. 142-160). Washington DC: Georgetown University.
- Greene, S. (2001). The Role of Character Assessments in Presidential Approval. American Politics Research, 29, 196-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X01029002004
- Kagay, M. R. (1999). Presidential Address: Public Opinion and Polling during Presidential Scandal and Impeachment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 449-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/297734
- Lanoue, D. J. (1994). Prospective and Retrospective Voting in Presidential-Year Elections. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 193-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299404700110
- Lockerbie, B. (1992). Prospective Voting in Presidential Elections: 1956-1988. American Politics Quarterly, 20, 308-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9202000303
- Maurer, P. J. (1999). Media Feeding Frenzies: Press Behavior during Two Clinton Scandals. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 29, 65-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1741-5705.00019
- Mayhew, D. R. (1991). Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Nadeau, R., Niemi, R. G., Fan, D. P., & Amato, T. (1999). Elite Economic Forecasts, Economic News, Mass Economic Judgements, and Presidential Approval. Journal of Politics, 61, 109-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2647777