An Analysis of National Courts Involvement in International Commercial Arbitration; Can International Commercial Arbitration Be Effective without National Courts?
- 1 Walden University, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Abstract
Globalisation has prompted the countries of the world to seek effective and efficient methods of dispute resolution which has led to the importance and widespread acceptance of arbitration as a preferred means of dispute resolution without the involvement of the National courts, however, this paper will show that the national courts are involved in the process of arbitration from commencement to recognition and enforcement of the arbitral awards. The purpose of this paper is to propose an appellate arbitral tribunal which will guarantee the independence of the arbitral process from the supervision and strict control of the national courts which is traditionally mandated to administer justice. This research paper aims to examine how national courts have interfered with the process of arbitration and whether arbitration can be effective on its own through an appellate arbitral tribunal. The effect of this study which proposes an appellate arbitral tribunal will, if implemented, will reinforce the confidence of states in the fast effective and final process of dispute resolution through arbitration.
- Abe, O. (2011). Enforcement of Foreign Award in Nigeria. Hungary: Central European University.
- Akinbote, A. (2009). Arbitration in Africa—The State of Arbitration in Nigeria. Transnational Dispute Management.
- Alfred Topper Inc. (New York) v. Edokpolor (1965). 1 All NLR, 292.
- Arbitration Act (1996). s 7.
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act s.5 . (n.d.).
- Attorney-General of Oyo State v. Nigeria Labour Congress, Oyo State Chapter & Ors (2003). 8 NWWLR 1. 33-34.
- Berg, A. (1981). The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958: An Overview. Vanderbilt Journal of Trans-national Law, 365, pp.
- Dallah Real Estate & Touris Holding Co v Pakistan (2010). UKSC 46 (SC).
- France (2011). French Code of Civil Procedure.
- Gantz, D. (2005). An Appellate Mechanism for Review of Arbitral Decisions in Investor-State Disputes; Prospects and Challenges (Vol. 703). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Rogers College of Law.
- Heyman v. Darwins Ltd., AC 356 (1942).
- Kalango V. Dokubo, 15 NWLR 32 (2003).
- Libya. (n.d.). Code of Civil Procedure. Articles 740 and 772 et seq of Document IV, Libya 2.a.
- Lord Mustill in Coppee Levalin NV v Ken Ben Fertilizers and Chemicals, 2 Lloyd’s Rep 109 (116 (HL) (1994).
- Lord Saville (1995). Arbitration and the Courts. Denning Lecture, 157.
- Macfoy v. United Africa Company, 3 All ER 1169 at 1172 (1961).
- Nigeria (1999). Federal Republic of Nigeria Constitution, § 12.
- Nigeria (199-91914). Federal Republic of Nigeria Ordinance, Orders and Regulations 199-91914.
- Nigeria (2004). Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria Cap A18.
- Nigeria (2006). NIC Act 2006. Sections 11-5 and 16-19.
- Nissan (Nig.) Ltd v. Mr. S. Yoganathan and Sun Motors ltd., 4 NWLR (Pt. 1185) 135 (2010).
- Redfern, A., & Hunter, M. (2009). Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- SNE v. Joc Oil Case (1989). 4 International Arbitration Report (July) B1-86.