Non-Governmental Organizations and the Barriers of Their Efficiency in Iran (after 1979)
- 1 Political Sciences, Tehran Markazi Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
- 2 Candidate in Political Sciences, Tehran Markazi Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Whenever social actors find a gap between what there is and what should be, a plethora of problems happen to exist. In this regard, researchers in the field detect the problem and carry out a large number of studies to find the causes and facts related to such a social phenomenon. The form and structure of the problem determines the method of solution-finding and decision-making; hence, addressing such a problem is regarded as the main task of the policy-makers. Although permanent development is considered as one of the main objectives of every country, there remain a multitude of arguments in achieving such a precious purpose. To this end, the citizens’ social participation to carry out specific activities related to repairing or ameliorating social damage is regarded to be one of the most efficient ways in NGOs. Nevertheless, NGOs or “Saazman-e-Mar- dom Nahad”, as recently recognized in Iran, have encountered a plethora of problems in working efficiently in the developing countries; therefore, there is an urgent need to find solutions to fix or ameliorate the NGOs problems through a descriptive research design. In this regard, the current study finds that political, legal, and economic structural barriers as well as the limitations of financial sources, managerial weakness, lack of NGOs freedom as endogenous barriers, all and all, add to the malignant disease of NGOs.
- Abrahamian, E. (1998). IRAN between Two Revolutions (pp. 76-98). Tehran: Nei Published.
- Abrahamian, E. (1999). Political Sociology of IRAN (p. 563). Tehran: Shirazeh Published.
- Afroogh, E. (2002). Popular Culture of Supreme Revolutionary. Cultural Council Journal, 18-19, 104.
- Almond, G., & Sidney, V. (1965). Civic Culture, Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Brown and Company.
- Amir-Ahmadi, H. (2001). Political Sociology, Civil Society and National Development (p. 81). Tehran: Naghshonegar Published.
- Azghandi, A. R. (1997). Researches of the Civil Society (pp. 402-407). Tehran: Revolution Cultural Documents Organization Published.
- Babbio, N. (1989). Democracy and Dictatorship: The Nature and Limits of State Power (p. 24). Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Backhaus, J. G. (2004). Schumpeter’s Contributions in the Area of Fiscal Sociology First Approximation. Journal of Evolutionary Economic, 14, 143-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0186-z
- Bahar, M. (1942). A Brief History of Political Parties of IRAN (p. 9). Tehran: Rangin Published.
- Bashiriyeh, H. (2003). Reason in Politics, 35 Speeches in Philosophy of Sociology and Policy Development (p. 691). Tehran: Contemporary Look Published.
- Bashiriyeh, H. (2004). Political Sociology (p. 330). Tehran: Ney Published.
- Beblawi, H., & Luciani, G. (1987). The Rentier State in the Arab World. London: Croom Helm.
- Chandhoke, N. (1999). Civil Society, the Government, and the Excavations of the Theory (p. 137). Tehran: Akhtaran Publication.
- Fuller, L. (1964). The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press Published.
- Hajjarian, S. (2009). Legalysm and Parliamentarism. Aeen Journal, 17-18, 44.
- Jajrami, H. (2001). Social Capital and Urban Management. Aeen Journal, 7, 34.
- Katouzian, M. A. (2014). The Conflict between Nation and State (p. 27). Tehran: Ney Published.
- Khaniki, H. (2004). Power, Civil Society, and the Press (pp. 3-4). Tehran: Tarh-e-Now Published.
- Koolai, E. (2005). Prospects of Democracy in Iran. Journal of Women’s Studies Association, 1, 8.